The ORACLES website will be undergoing a major upgrade beginning Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Please plan to complete any critical activities before or after this time.

ORACLES

Pedro Campuzano-Jost

Organization:

University of Colorado, Boulder

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

Co-Authored Publications:

Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
Brewer, J. F., et al. (2023), A Scheme for Representing Aromatic Secondary Organic Aerosols in Chemical Transport Models: Application to Source Attribution of Organic Aerosols Over South Korea During the KORUS-AQ Campaign, J. Geophys. Res., e2022JD037257, doi:10.1029/2022JD037257.
June, N. A., et al. (2023), Aerosol size distribution changes in FIREX-AQ biomass burning plumes: the impact of plume concentration on coagulation and OA condensation/evaporation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-12803-2022.
Katich, J., et al. (2023), Pyrocumulonimbus affect average stratospheric aerosol composition, Science, 379, 815-820, doi:10.1126/science.add3101.
Kumar, A., et al. (2023), Simulating wildfire emissions and plume rise using geostationary satellite fire radiative power measurements: a case study of the 2019 Williams Flats fire, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-10195-2022.
Rickly, P., et al. (2023), Emission factors and evolution of SO2 measured from biomass burning in wildfires and agricultural fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2023), Understanding the Evolution of Smoke Mass Extinction Efficiency Using Field Campaign Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099175, doi:10.1029/2022GL099175.
Shah, V., et al. (2023), Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023.
Shah, V., et al. (2023), Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023.
Tomsche, L., et al. (2023), Measurement report: Emission factors of NH3 and NHx for wildfires and agricultural fires in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023.
Warneke, C., et al. (2023), Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ), J. Geophys. Res., 128, e2022JD037758, doi:10.1029/2022JD037758.
Zhu, H., et al. (2023), Parameterization of size of organic and secondary inorganic aerosol for efficient representation of global aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-5023-2023.
Adachi, K., et al. (2022), Fine ash-bearing particles as a major aerosol component in biomass burning smoke, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2021JD035657, doi:10.1029/2021JD035657.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2109628118.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO2, HONO, NOy , and CO during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901-4930, doi:10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022.
Day, D. A., et al. (2022), A systematic re-evaluation of methods for quantification of bulk particle-phase organic nitrates using real-time aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 459-483, doi:10.5194/amt-15-459-2022.
Fung, K. M., et al. (2022), Exploring dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation and implications for global aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-1549-2022.
Kacenelenbogen, M. S., et al. (2022), Identifying chemical aerosol signatures using optical suborbital observations: how much can optical properties tell us about aerosol composition?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-3713-2022.
Kim, D., et al. (2022), Field observational constraints on the controllers in glyoxal (CHOCHO) reactive uptake to aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-805-2022.
Lee, Y. R., et al. (2022), An investigation of petrochemical emissions during KORUS-AQ: Ozone production, reactive nitrogen evolution, and aerosol production. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 00079-24, doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00079.
Oak, Y. J., et al. (2022), Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst..
Saide Peralta, et al. (2022), Understanding the Evolution of Smoke Mass Extinction Efficiency Using Field Campaign Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099175, doi:10.1029/2022GL099175.
Schwantes, R., et al. (2022), Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 14, e2021MS002889, doi:10.1029/2021MS002889.
Stockwell, C. E., et al. (2022), Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7564-7577, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07121.
Travis, K. R., et al. (2022), Limitations in representation of physical processes prevent successful simulation of PM2.5 during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-7933-2022.
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2022), Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022.
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Adv.7, eabl3648 (2021) 8 December 2021SCIENCE ADVANCES, Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Xu et al., Sci., 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Science Advances, 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
Brock, C., et al. (2021), Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023-15063, doi:10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021.
Chen, X., et al. (2021), HCOOH in the Remote Atmosphere: Constraints from Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Airborne Observations, ACS Earth Space Chem., doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00049.
Decker, Z., et al. (2021), Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15646-15657, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03803.
Gonzalez, Y., et al. (2021), Impact of stratospheric air and surface emissions on tropospheric nitrous oxide during ATom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11113-11132, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11113-2021.
Guo, H., et al. (2021), The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: a case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3631-3655, doi:10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021.
Jo, D. S., et al. (2021), Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395-3425, doi:10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021.
Kenagy, H., et al. (2021), Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05521.
Moore, R., et al. (2021), Sizing response of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) and Laser Aerosol Spectrometer (LAS) to changes in submicron aerosol composition and refractive index, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4517-4542, doi:10.5194/amt-14-4517-2021.
Nair, A. A., et al. (2021), Machine learning uncovers aerosol size information from chemistry and meteorology to quantify potential cloud-forming particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., doi:10.1029/2021GL094133.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere, Commun Earth Environ, 2, doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00164-0.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201-11224, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021.
Pagonis, D., et al. (2021), Airborne extractive electrospray mass spectrometry measurements of the chemical composition of organic aerosol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1545-1559, doi:10.5194/amt-14-1545-2021.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2021), Aerosol pH Indicator and Organosulfate Detectability from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry Measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., doi:10.5194/amt-2020-339.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2021), Aerosol pH indicator and organosulfate detectability from aerosol mass spectrometry measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2237-2260, doi:10.5194/amt-14-2237-2021.
Thompson, C., et al. (2021), The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1.
Wiggins, E. B., et al. (2021), Reconciling assumptions in bottom-up and top-down approaches for estimating aerosol emission rates from wildland fires using observations from FIREX-AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JD035692, doi:10.1029/2021JD035692.
Zhai, S., et al. (2021), Relating geostationary satellite measurements of aerosol optical depth (AOD) over East Asia to fine particulate matter (PM2.5): insights from the KORUS-AQ aircraft campaign and GEOS-Chem model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16775-16791, doi:10.5194/acp-21-16775-2021.
Carter, T. S., et al. (2020), How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2073-2097, doi:10.5194/acp-20-2073-2020.
Fairlie, T. D., et al. (2020), Estimates of Regional Source Contributions to the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer Using a Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 125, 4-20, doi:10.1029/2019JD031506.
Heim, E. W., et al. (2020), Asian dust observed during KORUS-AQ facilitates the uptake and incorporation of soluble pollutants during transport to South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 224, 117305, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117305.
Hodzic, A., et al. (2020), Characterization of organic aerosol across the global remote troposphere: a comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4607-4635, doi:10.5194/acp-20-4607-2020.
Hu, W., et al. (2020), Ambient Quantification and Size Distributions for Organic Aerosol in Aerosol Mass Spectrometers with the New Capture Vaporizer, Anal. Chem., 676, 676−689, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00310.
Jordan, C. E., et al. (2020), Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, 8, 28, doi:10.1525/elementa.424.
Koenig, T., et al. (2020), Quantitative detection of iodine in the stratosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, doi:10.1073/pnas.1916828117.
Lou, S., et al. (2020), New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 12, e2020MS002266, doi:10.1029/2020MS002266.
Nault, B., et al. (2020), Interferences with aerosol acidity quantification due to gas-phase ammonia uptake onto acidic sulfate filter samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6193-6213, doi:10.5194/amt-13-6193-2020.
Pai, S. J., et al. (2020), An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637-2665, doi:10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2020), Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6455-6478, doi:10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020.
Veres, P., et al. (2020), Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, doi:10.1073/pnas.1919344117.
Brock, C., et al. (2019), Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): methods, uncertainties, and data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3081-3099, doi:10.5194/amt-12-3081-2019.
Chen, Y., et al. (2019), Cite This: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5176−5186 pubs.acs.org/est Response of the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to Inorganic Sulfates and Organosulfur Compounds: Applications in Field and Laboratory Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00884.
Froyd, K., et al. (2019), A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6209-6239, doi:10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019.
Haskins, J. D., et al. (2019), Anthropogenic Control Over Wintertime Oxidation of Atmospheric Pollutants, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14,826-14,835, doi:10.1029/2019GL085498.
Hodshire, A., et al. (2019), The potential role of methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in aerosol formation and growth and the associated radiative forcings, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3137-3160, doi:10.5194/acp-19-3137-2019.
Jeong, D., et al. (2019), Integration of airborne and ground observations of nitryl chloride in the Seoul metropolitan area and the implications on regional oxidation capacity during KORUS-AQ 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12779-12795, doi:10.5194/acp-19-12779-2019.
Jimenez-Palacios, J., et al. (2019), ATom: L2 Measurements from CU High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-AMS), Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1716.
Liao, J., et al. (2019), Towards a satellite formaldehyde – in situ hybrid estimate for organic aerosol abundance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2765-2785, doi:10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019.
Shah, V., et al. (2019), Widespread Pollution From Secondary Sources of Organic Aerosols During Winter in the Northeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2974-2983, doi:10.1029/2018GL081530.
Sparks, T., et al. (2019), Comparison of Airborne Reactive Nitrogen Measurements During WINTER, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10,483-10,502, doi:10.1029/2019JD030700.
Tilmes, S., et al. (2019), Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2), J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 11, 4323-4351, doi:10.1029/2019MS001827.
Wang, S., et al. (2019), Atmospheric Acetaldehyde: Importance of Air‐Sea Exchange and a Missing Source in the Remote Troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, doi:10.1029/2019GL082034.
Williamson, C., et al. (2019), ATom: In Situ Tropical Aerosol Properties and Comparable Global Model Outputs, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1684.
Williamson, C., et al. (2019), A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics, Nature, 574, 399-403, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9.
Williamson, C. J., et al. (2019), A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics, Nature, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9.
Baker, K. R., et al. (2018), Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data, Science of the Total Environment, 637–638, 1137-1149, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.048.
Ervens, B., et al. (2018), Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16099-16119, doi:10.5194/acp-18-16099-2018.
Haskins, J. D., et al. (2018), Wintertime Gas-Particle Partitioning and Speciation of Inorganic Chlorine in the Lower Troposphere Over the Northeast United States and Coastal Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,897-12,916, doi:10.1029/2018JD028786.
Hu, W., et al. (2018), Evaluation of the New Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers (AMS): Elemental Composition and Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols (OA), Anal. Chem., 2, 410−421, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002.
Jaeglé, L., et al. (2018), Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, Chemistry, Deposition, and Export Over the Northeast United States During the WINTER Aircraft Campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,368-12,393, doi:10.1029/2018JD029133.
Katich, J., et al. (2018), Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 13,386-13,395, doi:10.1029/2018JD029206.
Lamb, K., et al. (2018), Estimating Source Region Influences on Black Carbon Abundance, Microphysics, and Radiative Effect Observed Over South Korea, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 13,527-13,548, doi:10.1029/2018JD029257.
McDuffie, E., et al. (2018), ClNO2 Yields From Aircraft Measurements During the 2015 WINTER Campaign and Critical Evaluation of the Current Parameterization, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,994-13,015, doi:10.1029/2018JD029358.
Nault, B., et al. (2018), Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769-17800, doi:10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018.
Schroder, J. C., et al. (2018), Sources and Secondary Production of Organic Aerosols in the Northeastern United States during WINTER, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 7771-7796, doi:10.1029/2018JD028475.
Shah, V., et al. (2018), Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 8110-8115, doi:10.1073/pnas.1803295115.
Wang, X., et al. (2018), Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635-653, doi:10.5194/acp-18-635-2018.
Wofsy, S. C., et al. (2018), ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1581.
Hu, W., et al. (2017), Evaluation of the new Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers (AMS) through field studies of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104.
Hu, W., et al. (2017), Evaluation of the new capture vapourizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through laboratory studies of inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2897-2921.
Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
Perring, A., et al. (2017), In situ measurements of water uptake by black carbon-containing aerosol in wildfire plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 1086-1097, doi:10.1002/2016JD025688.
Silvern, R. F., et al. (2017), Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5107-5118, doi:10.5194/acp-17-5107-2017.
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2017), Contrasting aerosol refractive index and hygroscopicity in the inflow and outflow of deep convective storms: Analysis of airborne data from DC3, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4565-4577, doi:10.1002/2017JD026638.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2017), Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon in the upper troposphere, Nature Geoscience, 10, 486, doi:10.1038/NGEO2960.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4987-5007, doi:10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009-5019, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016.
Fisher, J. A., et al. (2016), Organic nitrate chemistry and its implications for nitrogen budgets in an isoprene- and monoterpene-rich atmosphere: constraints from aircraft (SEAC4RS) and ground-based (SOAS) observations in the Southeast US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5969-5991, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5969-2016.
Hu, W., et al. (2016), Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambient isoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11563-11580, doi:10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016.
Liu, X., et al. (2016), Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7383-7414, doi:10.1002/2016JD025040.
Marais, E. A., et al. (2016), Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO2 emission controls, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603-1618, doi:10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016.
Nault, B., et al. (2016), Observational Constraints on the Oxidation of NOx in the Upper Troposphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 1468-1478, doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824.
Shingler, T., et al. (2016), Airborne characterization of subsaturated aerosol hygroscopicity and dry refractive index from the surface to 6.5km during the SEAC4RS campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4188-4210, doi:10.1002/2015JD024498.
Yates, E., et al. (2016), Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire, Atmos. Environ., 127, 293-302, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038.
Yu, P., et al. (2016), Surface dimming by the 2013 Rim Fire simulated by a sectional aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7079-7087, doi:10.1002/2015JD024702.
Barth, M. C., et al. (2015), The Deep Convective Clouds And Chemistry (Dc3) Field Campaign, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1281-1310.
Chen, Q., et al. (2015), Elemental composition of organic aerosol: The gap between ambient and laboratory measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4182-4189, doi:10.1002/2015GL063693.
Forrister, H., et al. (2015), Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623-4630, doi:10.1002/2015GL063897.
Hu, W., et al. (2015), Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11807-11833, doi:10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015.
Kim, P., et al. (2015), Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411-10433, doi:10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015.
Liao, J., et al. (2015), Airborne organosulfates measurements over the continental US, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2990-3005, doi:10.1002/2014JD022378.
Liu, J., et al. (2015), Brown carbon aerosol in the North American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841-7858, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2015), Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a multiplatform inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3609-3618, doi:10.1002/2015GL063737.
Wagner, N. L., et al. (2015), In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7085-7102, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015.
Yang, Q., et al. (2015), Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 8448-8468, doi:10.1002/2015JD023647.

Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Log in to ORACLES

Search form

ORACLES

Pedro Campuzano-Jost