The POSIDON website is undergoing a major upgrade that began Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Until that time, the current site will be visible but logins are disabled.

POSIDON

Glenn S. Diskin

Organization:

NASA Langley Research Center

Email:

Contact person by email

Business Phone:

Work: (757) 864-6268

Mobile: (757) 508-0249

Business Address:

Mail Stop 483

Bldg 1250 / Rm 138

Hampton, VA 23681

United States

First Author Publications:

Diskin, G. S., and J. P. DiGangi (2019), ATom: L2 In Situ Atmospheric Water Vapor from the Diode Laser Hygrometer (DLH), Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1710.
Diskin, G. S., et al. (2015), Ammonia and methane dairy emission plumes in the San Joaquin Valley of California from individual feedlot to regional scales, J. Geophys. Res., NH3, CH4.

Co-Authored Publications:

Crosbie, E., et al. (2024), Measurement report: Cloud and environmental properties associated with aggregated shallow marine cumulus and cumulus congestus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-6123-2024.
Decker, Z., et al. (2024), Airborne Observations Constrain Heterogeneous Nitrogen and Halogen Chemistry on Tropospheric and Stratospheric Biomass Burning Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107273, doi:10.1029/2023GL107273.
Edwards, E., et al. (2024), Sea salt reactivity over the northwest Atlantic: an in-depth look using the airborne ACTIVATE dataset, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-3349-2024.
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
Li, X., et al. (2024), Process Modeling of Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in Summertime Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Over the Western North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 129, e2023JD039489, doi:10.1029/2023JD039489.
Zhang, J., et al. (2024), Stratospheric air intrusions promote global-scale new particle formation.Science, Wang, 385, 210-216, doi:10.1126/science.adn2961.
Cho, C., et al. (2023), a petrochemical industry and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission rate, Elem Sci Anth, 9, doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00015.
Corral, A., et al. (2023), Environmental Science: Atmospheres View Article Online PAPER View Journal Dimethylamine in cloud water: a case study over, The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry Environ. Sci.: Atmos, 10.1039/D2EA00117A, doi:10.1039/d2ea00117a.
Ferrare, R., et al. (2023), Airborne HSRL-2 measurements of elevated aerosol depolarization associated with non-spherical sea salt, TYPE Original Research, doi:10.3389/frsen.2023.1143944.
Guo, H., et al. (2023), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements – corrected, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 99-117, doi:10.5194/acp-23-99-2023.
Kim, H., et al. (2023), Observed versus simulated OH reactivity during KORUS-AQ campaign: Implications for emission inventory and chemical environment in East Asia, KORUS-AQ campaign. Elem Sci Anth, 10, 1-26, doi:https.
Krysztofiak, G., et al. (2023), N2O Temporal Variability from the Middle Troposphere to the Middle Stratosphere Based on Airborne and Balloon-Borne Observations during the Period 1987–2018, Atmosphere, 14, 585, doi:10.3390/atmos14030585.
Pagonis, D., et al. (2023), Impact of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol Volatility on Smoke Concentrations Downwind of Fires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 17011-17021, doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05017.
Rickly, P., et al. (2023), Emission factors and evolution of SO2 measured from biomass burning in wildfires and agricultural fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022.
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2023), Spatially coordinated airborne data and complementary products for aerosol, gas, cloud, and meteorological studies: the NASA ACTIVATE dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419-3472, doi:10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023.
Tang, Y., et al. (2023), Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign, Geosci. Model. Dev., doi:10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022.
Tomsche, L., et al. (2023), Measurement report: Emission factors of NH3 and NHx for wildfires and agricultural fires in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2109628118.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO2, HONO, NOy , and CO during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901-4930, doi:10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022.
Brune, W. H., et al. (2022), Observations of atmospheric oxidation and ozone production in South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 269, 118854, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118854.
Cho, C., et al. (2022), a petrochemical industry and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission rate, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9, doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00015.
Corral, A., et al. (2022), Cold Air Outbreaks Promote New Particle Formation Off the U.S. East Coast, Geophys. Res. Lett..
Dadashazar, H., et al. (2022), Analysis of MONARC and ACTIVATE Airborne Aerosol Data for Aerosol-Cloud Interaction Investigations: Efficacy of Stairstepping Flight Legs for Airborne In Situ Sampling, hosseind@arizona.edu (H.D.armin@arizona.edu (A.S., 13, 1242, doi:10.3390/atmos13081242.
Deeter, M., et al. (2022), The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325-2344, doi:10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022.
Deeter, M., et al. (2022), The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325-2344, doi:10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022.
Froyd, K., et al. (2022), Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements, Nat. Geosci., 15, 177-183, doi:10.1038/s41561-022-00901-w.
Kim, D., et al. (2022), Field observational constraints on the controllers in glyoxal (CHOCHO) reactive uptake to aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-805-2022.
Lee, Y. R., et al. (2022), An investigation of petrochemical emissions during KORUS-AQ: Ozone production, reactive nitrogen evolution, and aerosol production. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 00079-24, doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00079.
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
Oak, Y. J., et al. (2022), Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst..
Peterson, D., et al. (2022), Measurements from inside a Thunderstorm Driven by Wildfire: The 2019 FIREX-AQ Field Experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, E2140-E2167, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0049.1.
Schlosser, J., et al. (2022), Polarimeter + Lidar–Derived Aerosol Particle Number Concentration, Front. Remote Sens., 3, 885332, doi:10.3389/frsen.2022.885332.
Stockwell, C. E., et al. (2022), Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7564-7577, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07121.
Tang, W., et al. (2022), Effects of Fire Diurnal Variation and Plume Rise on U.S. Air Quality During FIREX-AQ and WE-CAN Based on the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICAv0), J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036650, doi:10.1029/2022JD036650.
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2022), Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022.
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Adv.7, eabl3648 (2021) 8 December 2021SCIENCE ADVANCES, Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Xu et al., Sci., 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Science Advances, 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
Bates, K. H., et al. (2021), The Global Budget of Atmospheric Methanol: New Constraints on Secondary, Oceanic, and Terrestrial Sources, J. Geophys. Res., 126, doi:10.1029/2020JD033439.
Brock, C., et al. (2021), Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023-15063, doi:10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021.
Decker, Z., et al. (2021), Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15646-15657, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03803.
Decker, Z., et al. (2021), Nighttime and daytime dark oxidation chemistry in wildfire plumes: an observation and model analysis of FIREX-AQ aircraft data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16293-16317, doi:10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021.
Guo, H., et al. (2021), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13729-13746, doi:10.5194/acp-21-13729-2021.
Hilario, M., et al. (2021), Measurement report: Long-range transport patterns into the tropical northwest Pacific during the CAMP2Ex aircraft campaign: chemical composition, size distributions, and the impact of convection, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3777-3802, doi:10.5194/acp-21-3777-2021.
Hintsa, E., et al. (2021), UAS Chromatograph for Atmospheric Trace Species (UCATS) – a versatile instrument for trace gas measurements on airborne platforms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6795-6819, doi:10.5194/amt-14-6795-2021.
Liao, J., et al. (2021), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
Liu, S., et al. (2021), Sea spray aerosol concentration modulated by sea surface temperature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2020583118.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere, Commun Earth Environ, 2, doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00164-0.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201-11224, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021.
Thompson, C., et al. (2021), The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1.
Wang, S., et al. (2021), Chemical Tomography in a Fresh Wildland Fire Plume: A Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Study, J. Geophys. Res..
Wiggins, E. B., et al. (2021), Reconciling assumptions in bottom-up and top-down approaches for estimating aerosol emission rates from wildland fires using observations from FIREX-AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JD035692, doi:10.1029/2021JD035692.
Williamson, C., et al. (2021), Large hemispheric difference in nucleation mode aerosol concentrations in the lowermost stratosphere at mid and high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9065-9088, doi:10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021.
Zhou, D. K., et al. (2021), Wildfire-Induced CO Plume Observations From NAST-I During the FIREX-AQ Field Campaign, IEEE Journal Of Selected Topics In Applied Earth Observations And Remote Sensing, 14, 2901-2910, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3059855.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2020), Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions., Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-2020-315.
Brune, W. H., et al. (2020), Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031685.
Cuchiara, G. C., et al. (2020), Vertical Transport, Entrainment, and Scavenging Processes Affecting Trace Gases in a Modeled and Observed SEAC4RS Case Study, J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031957.
Eck, T. F., et al. (2020), Influence of cloud, fog, and high relative humidity during pollution transport events in South Korea: Aerosol properties and PM2.5 variability, Atmos. Environ., 232, 117530, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117530.
Gaubert, B., et al. (2020), Correcting model biases of CO in East Asia: impact on oxidant distributions during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14617-14647, doi:10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020.
Hannun, R. A., et al. (2020), Spatial heterogeneity in CO2, CH4, and energy fluxes: insights from airborne eddy covariance measurements over the Mid-Atlantic region, Environmental Research Letters., 15, 035008, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7391.
Jensen, E., et al. (2020), Assessment of Observational Evidence for Direct Convective Hydration of the Lower Stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JD032793, doi:10.1029/2020JD032793.
Jordan, C. E., et al. (2020), Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, 8, 28, doi:10.1525/elementa.424.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2020), Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6455-6478, doi:10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020.
Schroeder, J. R., et al. (2020), Observation-based modeling of ozone chemistry in the Seoul metropolitan area during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ), Elem Sci Anth, 8, doi:10.1525/elementa.400.
Souri, A., et al. (2020), Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO/NO2 ratios for inferring ozone sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Environ., 224, 117341, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341.
Tang, W., et al. (2020), Assessing Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) carbon monoxide retrievals over urban versus non-urban regions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1337-1356, doi:10.5194/amt-13-1337-2020.
Thames, A., et al. (2020), Missing OH reactivity in the global marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4013-4029, doi:10.5194/acp-20-4013-2020.
Travis, K., et al. (2020), Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753-7781, doi:10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020.
Wang, S., et al. (2020), Global Atmospheric Budget of Acetone: Air‐Sea Exchange and the Contribution to Hydroxyl Radicals, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JD032553, doi:10.1029/2020JD032553.
Halliday, H., et al. (2019), Using Short‐Term CO/CO2 Ratios to Assess Air Mass Differences Over the Korean Peninsula During KORUS‐AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10,951-10,972, doi:10.1029/2018JD029697.
Murphy, D., et al. (2019), The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4093-4104, doi:10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019.
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2019), Aerosol–Cloud–Meteorology Interaction Airborne Field Investigations: Using Lessons Learned from the U.S. West Coast in the Design of ACTIVATE off the U.S. East Coast, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1511-1528, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0100.1.
Tang, W., et al. (2019), Source Contributions to Carbon Monoxide Concentrations During KORUS‐AQ Based on CAM‐chem Model Applications, J. Geophys. Res..
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2019), Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.1821661116.
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2019), ATom: Column-Integrated Densities of Hydroxyl and Formaldehyde in Remote Troposphere, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1669.
Brune, W. H., et al. (2018), Atmospheric oxidation in the presence of clouds during the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14493-14510, doi:10.5194/acp-18-14493-2018.
Cheng, Y., et al. (2018), Estimator of Surface Ozone Using Formaldehyde and Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Over the Eastern United States in Summer, J. Geophys. Res., 123, doi:10.1029/2018JD028452.
Jensen, E., et al. (2018), Heterogeneous ice nucleation in the tropical tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2018JD028949.
Lamb, K., et al. (2018), Estimating Source Region Influences on Black Carbon Abundance, Microphysics, and Radiative Effect Observed Over South Korea, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 13,527-13,548, doi:10.1029/2018JD029257.
Nault, B., et al. (2018), Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769-17800, doi:10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018.
Oh, Y., et al. (2018), Characteristics of greenhouse gas concentrations derived from ground-based FTS spectra at Anmyeondo, South Korea, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2361-2374, doi:10.5194/amt-11-2361-2018.
Tang, W., et al. (2018), Evaluating high-resolution forecasts of atmospheric CO and CO2 from a global prediction system during KORUS-AQ field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11007-11030, doi:10.5194/acp-18-11007-2018.
Wofsy, S. C., et al. (2018), ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1581.
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2018), The NASA Carbon Airborne Flux Experiment (CARAFE): instrumentation and methodology, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1757-1776, doi:10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018.
Cheng, Y., et al. (2017), Large biogenic contribution to boundary layer O3-CO regression slope in summer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, doi:10.1002/2017GL074405.
Jensen, E., et al. (2017), The NASA Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX): High-altitude aircraft measurements in the tropical western Pacific, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 12/2015, 129-144, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00263.1.
Jensen, E., et al. (2017), Physical processes controlling the spatial distributions of relative humidity in the tropical tropopause layer over the Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6094-6107, doi:10.1002/2017JD026632.
Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
Nault, B., et al. (2017), Lightning NOx Emissions: Reconciling Measured and Modeled Estimates With Updated NOx Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9479-9488, doi:10.1002/2017GL074436.
Perring, A., et al. (2017), In situ measurements of water uptake by black carbon-containing aerosol in wildfire plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 1086-1097, doi:10.1002/2016JD025688.
Twohy, C., et al. (2017), Saharan dust, convective lofting, aerosol enhancement zones, and potential impacts on ice nucleation in the tropical upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8833-8851, doi:10.1002/2017JD026933.
Beyersdorf, A., et al. (2016), The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on aerosol extinction variability in the Baltimore–Washington, D.C. region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1003-1015, doi:10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4987-5007, doi:10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009-5019, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016.
Cai, C., et al. (2016), Simulating reactive nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and ozone in California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008 with high wildfire activity, Atmos. Environ., 128, 28-44, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.031.
Jensen, E., et al. (2016), On the Susceptibility of Cold Tropical Cirrus to Ice Nuclei Abundance, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2445-2464, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1.
Liu, X., et al. (2016), Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7383-7414, doi:10.1002/2016JD025040.
Müller, M., et al. (2016), In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a small biomass burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3813-3824, doi:10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016.
Ott, L., et al. (2016), Frequency and impact of summertime stratospheric intrusions over Maryland during DISCOVER-AQ (2011): New evidence from NASA’s GEOS-5 simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 3687-3706, doi:10.1002/2015JD024052.
Yates, E., et al. (2016), Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire, Atmos. Environ., 127, 293-302, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038.
Zamora, L., et al. (2016), Aircraft-measured indirect cloud effects from biomass burning smoke in the Arctic and subarctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 715-738, doi:10.5194/acp-16-715-2016.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2016), Large vertical gradient of reactive nitrogen oxides in the boundary layer: Modeling analysis of DISCOVER-AQ 2011 observations, J. Geophys. Res., 121, doi:10.1002/2015JD024203.
Apel, E., et al. (2015), Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2505-2523, doi:10.1002/2014JD022121.
Barth, M. C., et al. (2015), The Deep Convective Clouds And Chemistry (Dc3) Field Campaign, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1281-1310.
Emmons, L., et al. (2015), The POLARCAT Model Intercomparison Project (POLMIP): overview and evaluation with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6721-6744, doi:10.5194/acp-15-6721-2015.
Forrister, H., et al. (2015), Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623-4630, doi:10.1002/2015GL063897.
Liu, J., et al. (2015), Brown carbon aerosol in the North American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841-7858, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015.
Monks, S. A., et al. (2015), Multi-model study of chemical and physical controls on transport of anthropogenic and biomass burning pollution to the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3575-3603, doi:10.5194/acp-15-3575-2015.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2015), Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a multiplatform inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3609-3618, doi:10.1002/2015GL063737.
Wagner, N. L., et al. (2015), In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7085-7102, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015.
Yang, Q., et al. (2015), Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 8448-8468, doi:10.1002/2015JD023647.
He, H., et al. (2014), An elevated reservoir of air pollutants over the Mid-Atlantic States during the 2011 DISCOVER-AQ campaign: Airborne measurements and numerical simulations, Atmos. Environ., 85, 18-30, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.039.
Heymsfield, A., et al. (2014), Relationships between Ice Water Content and Volume Extinction Coefficient from In Situ Observations for Temperatures from 08 to 2868C: Implications for Spaceborne Lidar Retrievals*, J. Appl. Meteor. Climat., 53, 479-505, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1.
Muhlbauer, A., et al. (2014), Impact of large-scale dynamics on the microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3976-3996, doi:10.1002/2013JD020035.
Rollins, A., et al. (2014), Evaluation of UT/LS hygrometer accuracy by intercomparison during the NASA MACPEX mission, J. Geophys. Res., 119, doi:10.1002/2013JD020817.
Thompson, A. M., et al. (2014), Ozone profiles in the Baltimore-Washington region (2006–2011): satellite comparisons and DISCOVER-AQ observations, J Atmos Chem, 72, 393-422, doi:10.1007/s10874-014-9283-z.
Ueyama, R., et al. (2014), Dehydration in the tropical tropopause layer: A case study for model evaluation using aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5299-5316, doi:10.1002/2013JD021381.
Bian, H., et al. (2013), Source attributions of pollution to the Western Arctic during the NASA ARCTAS field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4707-4721, doi:10.5194/acp-13-4707-2013.
Browne, E. C., et al. (2013), Observations of total RONO2 over the boreal forest: NOx sinks and HNO3 sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4543-4562, doi:10.5194/acp-13-4543-2013.
Jensen, E., et al. (2013), Ice nucleation and dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.1217104110.
Apel, E., et al. (2012), Impact of the deep convection of isoprene and other reactive trace species on radicals and ozone in the upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1135-1150, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1135-2012.
Choi, S., et al. (2012), Analysis of satellite-derived Arctic tropospheric BrO columns in conjunction with aircraft measurements during ARCTAS and ARCPAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1255-1285, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1255-2012.
Dupont, R., et al. (2012), Attribution and evolution of ozone from Asian wild fires using satellite and aircraft measurements during the ARCTAS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 169-188, doi:10.5194/acp-12-169-2012.
Klonecki, A., et al. (2012), Assimilation of IASI satellite CO fields into a global chemistry transport model for validation against aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4493-4512, doi:10.5194/acp-12-4493-2012.
Olson, J., et al. (2012), An analysis of fast photochemistry over high northern latitudes during spring and summer using in-situ observations from ARCTAS and TOPSE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6799-6825, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6799-2012.
Sahu, L., et al. (2012), Emission characteristics of black carbon in anthropogenic and biomass burning plumes over California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16302, doi:10.1029/2011JD017401.
Vogelmann, A. M., et al. (2012), Racoro Extended-Term Aircraft Observations Of Boundary Layer Clouds, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 861-878, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00189.1.
Wennberg, P., et al. (2012), On the Sources of Methane to the Los Angeles Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9282-9289, doi:10.1021/es301138y.
Carn, S. A., et al. (2011), In situ measurements of tropospheric volcanic plumes in Ecuador and Colombia during TC4, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D00J24, doi:10.1029/2010JD014718.
Chen, G., et al. (2011), Observations of Saharan dust microphysical and optical properties from the Eastern Atlantic during NAMMA airborne field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 723-740, doi:10.5194/acp-11-723-2011.
Cubison, M. J., et al. (2011), Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049-12064, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011.
Fried, A., et al. (2011), Detailed comparisons of airborne formaldehyde measurements with box models during the 2006 INTEX-B and MILAGRO campaigns: potential evidence for significant impacts of unmeasured and multi-generation volatile organic carbon compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11867-11894, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11867-2011.
Hecobian, A., et al. (2011), Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325-13337, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011.
Hornbrook, R. S., et al. (2011), Observations of nonmethane organic compounds during ARCTAS – Part 1: Biomass burning emissions and plume enhancements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11103-11130, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11103-2011.
Kondo, Y., et al. (2011), Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, doi:10.1029/2010JD015152.
Liang, Q., et al. (2011), Reactive nitrogen, ozone and ozone production in the Arctic troposphere and the impact of stratosphere-troposphere exchange, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13181-13199, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13181-2011.
Matsui, H., et al. (2011), Seasonal variation of the transport of black carbon aerosol from the Asian continent to the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05202, doi:10.1029/2010JD015067.
Matsui, H., et al. (2011), Accumulation‐mode aerosol number concentrations in the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign: Long‐range transport of polluted and clean air from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20217, doi:10.1029/2011JD016189.
McHaughton, C. S., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosols in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ACTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
McNaughton, C. S., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7561-2011.
Pfister, G., et al. (2011), CO source contribution analysis for California during ARCTAS-CARB., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7515-7532, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
Simpson, I. J., et al. (2011), Boreal forest fire emissions in fresh Canadian smoke plumes: C1-C10 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO2, CO, NO2, NO, HCN and CH3CN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6445-6463, doi:10.5194/acp-11-6445-2011.
Alvarado, M. J., et al. (2010), Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9739-9760, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9739-2010.
Avery, M., et al. (2010), Convective distribution of tropospheric ozone and tracers in the Central American ITCZ region: Evidence from observations during TC4, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J21, doi:10.1029/2009JD013450.
Croteau, P., et al. (2010), Effect of local and regional sources on the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide in the tropical free troposphere and tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J11, doi:10.1029/2009JD013117.
Fisher, J. A., et al. (2010), Source attribution and interannual variability of Arctic pollution in spring constrained by aircraft (ARCTAS, ARCPAC) and satellite (AIRS) observations of carbon monoxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 977-996, doi:10.5194/acp-10-977-2010.
Perring, A., et al. (2010), Alkylnitrate production and persistence in Mexico City plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 23755-23790.
Perring, A., et al. (2010), The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi:10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010.
Pommier, M. K., et al. (2010), IASI carbon monoxide validation over Arctic during POLARCAT spring and summer campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 14445-14494.
Thompson, A. M., et al. (2010), Convective and wave signatures in ozone profiles over the equatorial Americas: Views from TC4 2007 and SHADOZ, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J23, doi:10.1029/2009JD012909.
Tilmes, S., et al. (2010), An aircraft-based upper troposphere lower stratosphere O3, CO and H2O climatology for the Northern Hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res. (submitted).
Warner, J., et al. (2010), Improved agreement of AIRS tropospheric carbon monoxide products with other EOS sensors using optimal estimation retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9521-9533, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9521-2010.
Mao, J., et al. (2009), Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163-173, doi:10.5194/acp-9-163-2009.
Millet, D., et al. (2009), Halocarbon Emissions from the United States and Mexico and Their Global Warming Potential, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1055-1060, doi:10.1021/es802146j.
Vay, S. A., et al. (2009), Sources and Transport of Δ14C in CO2 within the Mexico City Basin and vicinity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4973-4985.
Choi, Y., et al. (2008), Characteristics of the atmospheric CO2 signal as observed over the conterminous United States during INTEX-NA, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D07301.
Fried, A., et al. (2008), Role of convection in redistributing formaldehyde to the upper troposphere over North America and the North Atlantic during the summer 2004 INTEX campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17306, doi:10.1029/2007JD009760.
Livesey, N., et al. (2008), Validation of Aura Microwaver Limb Sounder O 3 and CO observations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S02, doi:10.1029/2007JD008805.
Livingston, J. M., et al. (2008), Comparison of Water Vapor Measurements by Airborne Sun Photometer and Diode Laser Hygrometer on the NASA DC-8, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 1733-1743, doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1047.1.
Ren, X., et al. (2008), HOx chemistry during INTEX-A 2004: Observation, model calculation, and comparison with previous studies, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D05310, doi:10.1029/2007JD009166.
Kim, S., et al. (2007), Measurement of HO2NO2 in the free troposphere during the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–North America 2004, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12S01, doi:10.1029/2006JD007676.
Eisele, F., et al. (2003), Summary of measurement intercomparisons during TRACE-P, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8791, doi:10.1029/2002JD003167.

Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Warning message

POSIDON

Glenn S. Diskin

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Log in to POSIDON

Search form

Warning message

POSIDON

Glenn S. Diskin