The ATom website is undergoing a major upgrade that began Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Until that time, the current site will be visible but logins are disabled.
Joyce E. Penner
Business Address:
Ann Arbor, MI
United StatesCo-Authored Publications:
- Bian, H., et al. (2024), Observationally constrained analysis of sulfur cycle in the marine atmosphere with NASA ATom measurements and AeroCom model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-1717-2024.
- Bian, H., et al. (2023), Observationally constrained analysis of sulfur cycle in the marine atmosphere with NASA ATom measurements and AeroCom model simulations, doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1966 (submitted).
- Li, J. 1. ✉., et al. (2022), in the climate system REVIEwS, Nature, doi:10.1038/scattering.
- Brasseur, G. P., et al. (2017), Impact of Aviation: FAA's Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative (ACCRI) Phase II, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 561-583, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00089.1.
- Kahn, R., et al. (2017), SAM-CAAM: A Concept for Acquiring Systematic Aircraft Measurements to Characterize Aerosol Air Masses, Bull. Am. Meteoro. Soc., 2215-2228, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0003.1.
- Sand, M., et al. (2017), Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12197-12218, doi:10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017.
- Seinfeld, J. H., et al. (2016), COLLOQUIUM INTRODUCTION Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol−cloud interactions in the climate system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113, doi:10.1073/pnas.1514043113.
- Jiao, C., et al. (2014), An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2399-2417, doi:10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014.
- Komurcu, M., et al. (2014), Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3372-3400, doi:10.1002/2013JD021119.
- Samset, B. H., et al. (2014), Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12465-12477, doi:10.5194/acp-14-12465-2014.
- Tsigaridis, K., et al. (2014), The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845-10895, doi:10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014.
- Myhre, G., et al. (2013), Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1853-1877, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013.
- Samset, B. H., et al. (2013), Black carbon vertical profiles strongly affect its radiative forcing uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2423-2434, doi:10.5194/acp-13-2423-2013.
- Wang, M., et al. (2012), Constraining cloud lifetime effects of aerosols using A-Train satellite observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15709, doi:10.1029/2012GL052204.
- Yi, B., et al. (2012), Simulation of the global contrail radiative forcing: A sensitivity analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L00F03, doi:10.1029/2012GL054042.
- Huneeus, N., et al. (2011), Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7781-7816, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011.
- Su, H., et al. (2011), Observed Increase of TTL Temperature and Water Vapor in Polluted Clouds over Asia, J. Climate, 24, 2728-2736, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3749.1.
- Bian, H., et al. (2009), Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2375-2386, doi:10.5194/acp-9-2375-2009.
- Koch, D., et al. (2009), Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9001-9026, doi:10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009.
- Liu, X., et al. (2007), Uncertainties in global aerosol simulations: Assessment using three meteorological data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11212, doi:10.1029/2006JD008216.
- Neu, J. L., M. Prather, and J. E. Penner (2007), Global atmospheric chemistry: Integrating over fractional cloud cover, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11306, doi:10.1029/2006JD008007.
- Textor, C., et al. (2007), The effect of harmonized emissions on aerosol properties in global models – an AeroCom experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4489-4501, doi:10.5194/acp-7-4489-2007.
- Bates, T., et al. (2006), Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1657-1732, doi:10.5194/acp-6-1657-2006.
- Kinne, S., et al. (2006), An AeroCom initial assessment – optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1815-1834, doi:10.5194/acp-6-1815-2006.
- Textor, C., et al. (2006), Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777-1813, doi:10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006.
- Diner, D., et al. (2004), Understanding Aerosols Paragon: An Integrated Approach for Characterizing Aerosol Climate Impacts and Environmental Interactions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1491, doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-10-1491.
- Kinne, S., et al. (2003), Monthly averages of aerosol properties: A global comparison among models, satellite data, and AERONET ground data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4634, doi:10.1029/2001JD001253.
- Menon, S., et al. (2003), Evaluating aerosol/cloud/radiation process parameterizations with single-column models and Second Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-2) cloudy column observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4762, doi:10.1029/2003JD003902.
- Olson, J., et al. (1997), Results from theIPCC photchemical model intercomparison (PhotoComp), J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5979-5991.
Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the
ESD Publications database are listed here.