Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.
Yonghoon Choi
Organization:
NASA Langley Research Center
Analytical Mechanics Associates
Email:
Business Phone:
Work:
(757) 864-5512
Mobile:
(757) 817-5311
Fax:
(757) 864-4343
Business Address:
NASA Langley Research Center
MS401A
Hampton, VA 23681
United StatesFirst Author Publications:
- Choi, Y., et al. (2008), Characteristics of the atmospheric CO2 signal as observed over the conterminous United States during INTEX-NA, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D07301.
Co-Authored Publications:
- Corral, A., et al. (2023), Environmental Science: Atmospheres View Article Online PAPER View Journal Dimethylamine in cloud water: a case study over, The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry Environ. Sci.: Atmos, 10.1039/D2EA00117A, doi:10.1039/d2ea00117a.
- Ferrare, R., et al. (2023), Airborne HSRL-2 measurements of elevated aerosol depolarization associated with non-spherical sea salt, TYPE Original Research, doi:10.3389/frsen.2023.1143944.
- Sorooshian, A., et al. (2023), Spatially coordinated airborne data and complementary products for aerosol, gas, cloud, and meteorological studies: the NASA ACTIVATE dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419-3472, doi:10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023.
- Brune, W. H., et al. (2022), Observations of atmospheric oxidation and ozone production in South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 269, 118854, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118854.
- Corral, A., et al. (2022), Cold Air Outbreaks Promote New Particle Formation Off the U.S. East Coast, Geophys. Res. Lett..
- Dadashazar, H., et al. (2022), Analysis of MONARC and ACTIVATE Airborne Aerosol Data for Aerosol-Cloud Interaction Investigations: Efficacy of Stairstepping Flight Legs for Airborne In Situ Sampling, hosseind@arizona.edu (H.D.armin@arizona.edu (A.S., 13, 1242, doi:10.3390/atmos13081242.
- Gonzalez, A., et al. (2022), Fossil Versus Nonfossil CO Sources in the US: New Airborne Constraints From ACT-America and GEM, Geophys. Res. Lett..
- Lee, Y. R., et al. (2022), An investigation of petrochemical emissions during KORUS-AQ: Ozone production, reactive nitrogen evolution, and aerosol production. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 00079-24, doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00079.
- Schroeder, J. R., et al. (2020), Observation-based modeling of ozone chemistry in the Seoul metropolitan area during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ), Elem Sci Anth, 8, doi:10.1525/elementa.400.
- Halliday, H., et al. (2019), Using Short‐Term CO/CO2 Ratios to Assess Air Mass Differences Over the Korean Peninsula During KORUS‐AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10,951-10,972, doi:10.1029/2018JD029697.
- Kostinek, J., et al. (2019), Adaptation and performance assessment of a quantum and interband cascade laser spectrometer for simultaneous airborne in situ observation of CH4, C2H6, CO2, CO and N2O, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1767-1783, doi:10.5194/amt-12-1767-2019.
- Mao, J., et al. (2018), Measurement of atmospheric CO2 column concentrations to cloud tops with a pulsed multi-wavelength airborne lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 127-140, doi:10.5194/amt-11-127-2018.
- Nault, B., et al. (2018), Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769-17800, doi:10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018.
- Tang, W., et al. (2018), Evaluating high-resolution forecasts of atmospheric CO and CO2 from a global prediction system during KORUS-AQ field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11007-11030, doi:10.5194/acp-18-11007-2018.
- Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
- Yates, E., et al. (2016), Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire, Atmos. Environ., 127, 293-302, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038.
- Simpson, I. J., et al. (2011), Boreal forest fire emissions in fresh Canadian smoke plumes: C1-C10 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO2, CO, NO2, NO, HCN and CH3CN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6445-6463, doi:10.5194/acp-11-6445-2011.
- Browell, E., et al. (2010), Airborne Validation of Laser Remote Measurements of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, Proceedings of the ILRC25 (25th International Laser Radar Conference), St. Petersburg, Russia, July 5-9, 779-782.
- Vay, S. A., et al. (2009), Sources and Transport of Δ14C in CO2 within the Mexico City Basin and vicinity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4973-4985.