Organization
University of Colorado, Boulder
Email
Business Phone
Work
(303) 735-5741
Mobile
(720) 352-8153
Business Address
CIRES, University of Colorado Boulder
216 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
Co-Authored Publications
-
Tang, W., et al. (2022), Effects of Fire Diurnal Variation and Plume Rise on U.S. Air Quality During FIREX-AQ and WE-CAN Based on the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICAv0), J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036650, doi:10.1029/2022JD036650.
-
Carter, T.S., et al. (2020), How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2073-2097, doi:10.5194/acp-20-2073-2020.
-
Gaubert, B., et al. (2016), Toward a chemical reanalysis in a coupled chemistry-climate model: An evaluation of MOPITT CO assimilation and its impact on tropospheric composition, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7310-7343, doi:10.1002/2016JD024863.
-
Zhang, F., et al. (2014), Sensitivity of mesoscale modeling of smoke direct radiative effect to the emission inventory: A case study in northern sub-Saharan African region, Environmental Research Letter, 9, 075002, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/075002.
-
Lin, M., et al. (2012), Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United States in spring, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V07, doi:10.1029/2011JD016961.
-
Akagi, S., et al. (2011), Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039-4072, doi:10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011.
-
Hornbrook, R.S., et al. (2011), Observations of nonmethane organic compounds during ARCTAS – Part 1: Biomass burning emissions and plume enhancements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11103-11130, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11103-2011.
-
Pfister, G., et al. (2011), CO source contribution analysis for California during ARCTAS-CARB., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7515-7532, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
-
Aiken, A.C., et al. (2010), Mexico city aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 2: Analysis of the biomass burning contribution and the non-fossil carbon fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5315-5341, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5315-2010.
-
Emmons, L.K., et al. (2010), Impact of Mexico City emissions on regional air quality from MOZART-4 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6195-6212, doi:10.5194/acp-10-6195-2010.
-
Naik, V., et al. (2010), Observational constraints on the global atmospheric budget of ethanol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 925-945.
-
Yokelson, R.J., et al. (2009), Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5785-5812, doi:10.5194/acp-9-5785-2009.
-
Hodzic, A., et al. (2007), Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 4705-4760.
-
Palmer, P.I., et al. (2006), Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D12315, doi:10.1029/2005JD006689.
Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.