Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.


Midwest US croplands determine model divergence in North American carbon fluxes

Sun, W., Y. Fang, X. Luo, Y. P. Shiga, Y. Zhang, A. E. Andrews, K. W. Thoning, J. B. Fisher, T. F. Keenan, and A. M. Michalak (2021), Midwest US croplands determine model divergence in North American carbon fluxes, AGU Advances, 2, doi:10.1029/2020AV000310.

Large uncertainties in North American terrestrial carbon fluxes hinder regional climate projections. Terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs), the essential tools for understanding continentalscale carbon cycle, diverge on whether temperate forests or croplands dominate carbon uptake in North America. Evidence from novel photosynthetic proxies, such as those based on chlorophyll fluorescence, has cast doubt on the “weak cropland, strong forest” carbon uptake patterns simulated by most TBMs. However, no systematic evaluation of TBMs has yet been attempted to pin down space-time patterns that are most consistent with regional CO2 observational constraints. Here, we leverage atmospheric CO2 observations and satellite-observed photosynthetic proxies to understand emergent space-time patterns in North American carbon fluxes from a large suite of TBMs and data-driven models. To do so, we evaluate how well the atmospheric signals resulting from carbon flux estimates reproduce the space-time variability in atmospheric CO2, as is observed by a network of continuous-monitoring towers over North America. Models with gross or net carbon fluxes that are consistent with the observed CO2 variability share a salient feature of growing-season carbon uptake in Midwest US croplands. Conversely, the remaining models place most growing-season uptake in boreal or temperate forests. Differences in model explanatory power depend mainly on the simulated annual cycles of cropland uptake—especially, the timing of peak uptake—rather than the distribution of annual mean fluxes across biomes. Our results suggest that improved model representation of cropland phenology is crucial to robust, policy-relevant estimation of North American carbon exchange. Plain Language Summary In North America, land ecosystems have been known to act as a net sink of carbon, but how carbon fluxes are distributed in space and time remains uncertain. A key unresolved question about space-time patterns of North American carbon exchange is whether croplands or temperate forests show the strongest uptake rate during the growing season. In this study, we evaluate a large suite of land biosphere models and models that are driven by remotely sensed vegetation indices or ground-based flux observations to pin down the space-time patterns in North American carbon exchange. Models are assessed based on how well their carbon flux estimates capture the variability in the atmospheric CO2 record observed from a network of towers. We find that models with carbon flux estimates that reproduce the observed CO2 variability well show a hotspot of strong growing-season carbon uptake in the Midwest US croplands. In contrast, models that reproduce the observed atmospheric CO2 variability less effectively place the strongest growing-season uptake in forests. Our findings reveal that peak cropland carbon uptake is underestimated in most models and that a better representation of cropland processes will be needed to obtain robust estimates of North American carbon fluxes.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.
Research Program: 
Carbon Cycle & Ecosystems Program (CCEP)