Organization
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory
University of Colorado, Boulder
Email
Business Phone
Work
(303) 497-4849
Mobile
(303) 246-6651
Fax
(303) 497-5126
Work
(303) 219-0566
Business Address
NOAA
325 Broadway
R/CSL7
Boulder, CO 80305
United States
Website
Co-Authored Publications
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2024), Airborne Observations Constrain Heterogeneous Nitrogen and Halogen Chemistry on Tropospheric and Stratospheric Biomass Burning Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107273, doi:10.1029/2023GL107273.
-
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
-
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
-
Roberts, J.M., et al. (2024), Observations of cyanogen bromide (BrCN) in the global troposphere and their relation to polar surface O3 destruction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-3421-2024.
-
Zhang, J., et al. (2024), Stratospheric air intrusions promote global-scale new particle formation.Science, Wang, 385, 210-216, doi:10.1126/science.adn2961.
-
Guo, H., et al. (2023), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements – corrected, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 99-117, doi:10.5194/acp-23-99-2023.
-
June, N.A., et al. (2023), Aerosol size distribution changes in FIREX-AQ biomass burning plumes: the impact of plume concentration on coagulation and OA condensation/evaporation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-12803-2022.
-
Katich, J.M., et al. (2023), Pyrocumulonimbus affect average stratospheric aerosol composition, Science, 379, 815-820, doi:10.1126/science.add3101.
-
Rickly, P., et al. (2023), Emission factors and evolution of SO2 measured from biomass burning in wildfires and agricultural fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022.
-
Roberts, J.M., et al. (2023), Observations of cyanogen bromide (BrCN) in the global troposphere and their relation to polar surface O3 destruction.(submitted), doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-860.
-
Shah, V., et al. (2023), Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023.
-
Shah, V., et al. (2023), Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2023), Application of the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols version 0 (MUSICAv0) for air quality research in Africa, Geosci. Model. Dev., doi:10.5194/gmd-16-6001-2023.
-
Tang, Y., et al. (2023), Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign, Geosci. Model. Dev., doi:10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2022), Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO2, HONO, NOy , and CO during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901-4930, doi:10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2022), Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2109628118.
-
Carter, T.S., et al. (2022), An improved representation of fire non-methane organic gases (NMOGs) in models: emissions to reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12093-12111, doi:10.5194/acp-22-12093-2022.
-
Langford, A.O., et al. (2022), The Fires, Asian, and Stratospheric Transport–Las Vegas Ozone Study (FAST-LVOS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Liu, S., et al. (2022), Composition and reactivity of volatile organic compounds in the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10937-10954, doi:10.5194/acp-22-10937-2022.
-
Schwantes, R.H., et al. (2022), Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 14, e2021MS002889, doi:10.1029/2021MS002889.
-
Stockwell, C.E., et al. (2022), Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7564-7577, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07121.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2022), Effects of Fire Diurnal Variation and Plume Rise on U.S. Air Quality During FIREX-AQ and WE-CAN Based on the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICAv0), J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036650, doi:10.1029/2022JD036650.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2022), Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022.
-
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Science Advances, 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
-
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Adv.7, eabl3648 (2021) 8 December 2021SCIENCE ADVANCES, Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Xu et al., Sci., 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
-
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
-
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
-
Brock, C.A., et al. (2021), Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023-15063, doi:10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021.
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2021), Nighttime and daytime dark oxidation chemistry in wildfire plumes: an observation and model analysis of FIREX-AQ aircraft data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16293-16317, doi:10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021.
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2021), Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15646-15657, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03803.
-
Francoeur, C.B., et al. (2021), Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US, Environmental Science & Technology, 1-28, doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07352.
-
Gonzalez, Y., et al. (2021), Impact of stratospheric air and surface emissions on tropospheric nitrous oxide during ATom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11113-11132, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11113-2021.
-
Guo, H., et al. (2021), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13729-13746, doi:10.5194/acp-21-13729-2021.
-
Hintsa, E.J., et al. (2021), UAS Chromatograph for Atmospheric Trace Species (UCATS) – a versatile instrument for trace gas measurements on airborne platforms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6795-6819, doi:10.5194/amt-14-6795-2021.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2021), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Murphy, D., et al. (2021), Radiative and chemical implications of the size and composition of aerosol particles in the existing or modified global stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8915-8932, doi:10.5194/acp-21-8915-2021.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2021), Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201-11224, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021.
-
Novak, G.A.W., et al. (2021), Rapid cloud removal of dimethyl sulfide oxidation products limits SO2 and cloud condensation nuclei production in the marine atmosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2110472118.
-
Thompson, C., et al. (2021), The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1.
-
Wang, S., et al. (2021), Chemical Tomography in a Fresh Wildland Fire Plume: A Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Study, J. Geophys. Res..
-
Williamson, C.J., et al. (2021), Large hemispheric difference in nucleation mode aerosol concentrations in the lowermost stratosphere at mid and high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9065-9088, doi:10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2020), Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions., Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-2020-315.
-
Brune, W.H., et al. (2020), Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031685.
-
Cuchiara, G.C., et al. (2020), Vertical Transport, Entrainment, and Scavenging Processes Affecting Trace Gases in a Modeled and Observed SEAC4RS Case Study, J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031957.
-
Hannun, R.A., et al. (2020), A cavity-enhanced ultraviolet absorption instrument for high-precision, fast-time-response ozone measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6877-6887, doi:10.5194/amt-13-6877-2020.
-
Thames, A.B., et al. (2020), Missing OH reactivity in the global marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4013-4029, doi:10.5194/acp-20-4013-2020.
-
Travis, K., et al. (2020), Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753-7781, doi:10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020.
-
Veres, P.R., et al. (2020), Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, doi:10.1073/pnas.1919344117.
-
Wang, S., et al. (2020), Global Atmospheric Budget of Acetone: Air‐Sea Exchange and the Contribution to Hydroxyl Radicals, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JD032553, doi:10.1029/2020JD032553.
-
Chen, X., et al. (2019), On the sources and sinks of atmospheric VOCs: an integrated analysis of recent aircraft campaigns over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9097-9123, doi:10.5194/acp-19-9097-2019.
-
Ryerson, T.B., et al. (2019), ATom: L2 In Situ Measurements from NOAA Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone (NOyO3) Instrument, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1734.
-
Wang, S., et al. (2019), Atmospheric Acetaldehyde: Importance of Air‐Sea Exchange and a Missing Source in the Remote Troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, doi:10.1029/2019GL082034.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2019), ATom: Column-Integrated Densities of Hydroxyl and Formaldehyde in Remote Troposphere, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1669.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2019), Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.1821661116.
-
Brune, W.H., et al. (2018), Atmospheric oxidation in the presence of clouds during the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14493-14510, doi:10.5194/acp-18-14493-2018.
-
Fisher, J.A.V., et al. (2018), Methyl, Ethyl, and Propyl Nitrates: Global Distribution and Impacts on Reactive Nitrogen in Remote Marine Environments, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,429-12,451, doi:10.1029/2018JD029046.
-
Li, J., et al. (2018), Decadal changes in summertime reactive oxidized nitrogen and surface ozone over the Southeast United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2341-2361, doi:10.5194/acp-18-2341-2018.
-
Murphy, D., et al. (2018), An aerosol particle containing enriched uranium encountered in the remote T upper troposphere, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 184–185, 95-100, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.01.006.
-
Silvern, R.F., et al. (2018), Observed NO/NO2 Ratios in the Upper Troposphere Imply Errors in NO-NO2-O3 Cycling Kinetics or an Unaccounted NOx Reservoir, Geophys. Res. Lett..
-
Wofsy, S., et al. (2018), ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1581.
-
Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
-
Marvin, M.R., et al. (2017), Impact of evolving isoprene mechanisms on simulated formaldehyde: An inter-comparison supported by in situ observations from SENEX, Atmos. Environ., 164, 325-336, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.049.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2017), Lightning NOx Emissions: Reconciling Measured and Modeled Estimates With Updated NOx Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9479-9488, doi:10.1002/2017GL074436.
-
Coggon, M.M., et al. (2016), Emissions of nitrogen-containing organic compounds from the burning of herbaceous and arboraceous biomass: Fuel composition dependence and the variability of commonly used nitrile tracers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9903-9912, doi:10.1002/2016GL070562.
-
Liu, X., et al. (2016), Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7383-7414, doi:10.1002/2016JD025040.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2016), Observational Constraints on the Oxidation of NOx in the Upper Troposphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 1468-1478, doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824.
-
Travis, K., et al. (2016), Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13561-13577, doi:10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2016), Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NOx regimes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2597-2610, doi:10.5194/acp-16-2597-2016.
-
Apel, E.C., et al. (2015), Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2505-2523, doi:10.1002/2014JD022121.
-
Barth, M.C., et al. (2015), The Deep Convective Clouds And Chemistry (Dc3) Field Campaign, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1281-1310.
-
Emmons, L.K., et al. (2015), The POLARCAT Model Intercomparison Project (POLMIP): overview and evaluation with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6721-6744, doi:10.5194/acp-15-6721-2015.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2015), Airborne organosulfates measurements over the continental US, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2990-3005, doi:10.1002/2014JD022378.
-
Wagner, N.L., et al. (2015), In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7085-7102, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2015), Quantifying sources and sinks of reactive gases in the lower atmosphere using airborne flux observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8231-8240, doi:10.1002/2015GL065839.
-
Brioude, ., et al. (2012), A new inversion method to calculate emission inventories without a prior at mesoscale: Application to the anthropogenic CO2 emission from Houston, Texas, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05312, doi:10.1029/2011JD016918.
-
Brock, C.A., et al. (2011), Characteristics, sources, and transport of aerosols measured in spring 2008 during the aerosol, radiation, and cloud processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) Project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2423-2453, doi:10.5194/acp-11-2423-2011.
Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.