Organization
NASA Langley Research Center
Email
Business Phone
Work
(757) 864-6268
Mobile
(757) 508-0249
Business Address
Mail Stop 483
Bldg 1250 / Rm 138
Hampton, VA 23681
United States
First Author Publications
-
Diskin, G.S., and J.P. DiGangi (2019), ATom: L2 In Situ Atmospheric Water Vapor from the Diode Laser Hygrometer (DLH), Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1710.
-
Diskin, G.S., et al. (2015), Ammonia and methane dairy emission plumes in the San Joaquin Valley of California from individual feedlot to regional scales, J. Geophys. Res., NH3, CH4.
Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.
Co-Authored Publications
-
Crosbie, E.C., et al. (2024), Measurement report: Cloud and environmental properties associated with aggregated shallow marine cumulus and cumulus congestus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-6123-2024.
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2024), Airborne Observations Constrain Heterogeneous Nitrogen and Halogen Chemistry on Tropospheric and Stratospheric Biomass Burning Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107273, doi:10.1029/2023GL107273.
-
Edwards, E., et al. (2024), Sea salt reactivity over the northwest Atlantic: an in-depth look using the airborne ACTIVATE dataset, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-3349-2024.
-
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
-
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
-
Li, X., et al. (2024), Process Modeling of Aerosol‐Cloud Interaction in Summertime Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Over the Western North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 129, e2023JD039489, doi:10.1029/2023JD039489.
-
Zhang, J., et al. (2024), Stratospheric air intrusions promote global-scale new particle formation.Science, Wang, 385, 210-216, doi:10.1126/science.adn2961.
-
Cho, C., et al. (2023), a petrochemical industry and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission rate, Elem Sci Anth, 9, doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00015.
-
Corral, A., et al. (2023), Environmental Science: Atmospheres View Article Online PAPER View Journal Dimethylamine in cloud water: a case study over, The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry Environ. Sci.: Atmos, 10.1039/D2EA00117A, doi:10.1039/d2ea00117a.
-
Ferrare, R.A., et al. (2023), Airborne HSRL-2 measurements of elevated aerosol depolarization associated with non-spherical sea salt, TYPE Original Research, doi:10.3389/frsen.2023.1143944.
-
Guo, H., et al. (2023), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements – corrected, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 99-117, doi:10.5194/acp-23-99-2023.
-
Kim, H., et al. (2023), Observed versus simulated OH reactivity during KORUS-AQ campaign: Implications for emission inventory and chemical environment in East Asia, KORUS-AQ campaign. Elem Sci Anth, 10, 1-26, doi:https.
-
Krysztofiak, G., et al. (2023), N2O Temporal Variability from the Middle Troposphere to the Middle Stratosphere Based on Airborne and Balloon-Borne Observations during the Period 1987–2018, Atmosphere, 14, 585, doi:10.3390/atmos14030585.
-
Pagonis, D.J., et al. (2023), Impact of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol Volatility on Smoke Concentrations Downwind of Fires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 17011-17021, doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05017.
-
Rickly, P., et al. (2023), Emission factors and evolution of SO2 measured from biomass burning in wildfires and agricultural fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022.
-
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2023), Spatially coordinated airborne data and complementary products for aerosol, gas, cloud, and meteorological studies: the NASA ACTIVATE dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419-3472, doi:10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023.
-
Tang, Y., et al. (2023), Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign, Geosci. Model. Dev., doi:10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022.
-
Tomsche, L., et al. (2023), Measurement report: Emission factors of NH3 and NHx for wildfires and agricultural fires in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2022), Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2109628118.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2022), Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO2, HONO, NOy , and CO during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901-4930, doi:10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022.
-
Brune, W.H., et al. (2022), Observations of atmospheric oxidation and ozone production in South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 269, 118854, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118854.
-
Cho, C., et al. (2022), a petrochemical industry and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission rate, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9, doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00015.
-
Corral, A., et al. (2022), Cold Air Outbreaks Promote New Particle Formation Off the U.S. East Coast, Geophys. Res. Lett..
-
Dadashazar, H., et al. (2022), Analysis of MONARC and ACTIVATE Airborne Aerosol Data for Aerosol-Cloud Interaction Investigations: Efficacy of Stairstepping Flight Legs for Airborne In Situ Sampling, hosseind@arizona.edu (H.D.armin@arizona.edu (A.S., 13, 1242, doi:10.3390/atmos13081242.
-
Deeter, M., et al. (2022), The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325-2344, doi:10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022.
-
Deeter, M., et al. (2022), The MOPITT Version 9 CO product: sampling enhancements and validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2325-2344, doi:10.5194/amt-15-2325-2022.
-
Froyd, K.D., et al. (2022), Dominant role of mineral dust in cirrus cloud formation revealed by global-scale measurements, Nat. Geosci., 15, 177-183, doi:10.1038/s41561-022-00901-w.
-
Kim, D., et al. (2022), Field observational constraints on the controllers in glyoxal (CHOCHO) reactive uptake to aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-805-2022.
-
Lee, Y.R., et al. (2022), An investigation of petrochemical emissions during KORUS-AQ: Ozone production, reactive nitrogen evolution, and aerosol production. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 00079-24, doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00079.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2022), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Oak, Y.J., et al. (2022), Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst..
-
Peterson, D.A., et al. (2022), Measurements from inside a Thunderstorm Driven by Wildfire: The 2019 FIREX-AQ Field Experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, E2140-E2167, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0049.1.
-
Schlosser, J.S., et al. (2022), Polarimeter + Lidar–Derived Aerosol Particle Number Concentration, Front. Remote Sens., 3, 885332, doi:10.3389/frsen.2022.885332.
-
Stockwell, C.E., et al. (2022), Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7564-7577, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07121.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2022), Effects of Fire Diurnal Variation and Plume Rise on U.S. Air Quality During FIREX-AQ and WE-CAN Based on the Multi-Scale Infrastructure for Chemistry and Aerosols (MUSICAv0), J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2022JD036650, doi:10.1029/2022JD036650.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2022), Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022.
-
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Adv.7, eabl3648 (2021) 8 December 2021SCIENCE ADVANCES, Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Xu et al., Sci., 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
-
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Science Advances, 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
-
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
-
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
-
Bates, K.H., et al. (2021), The Global Budget of Atmospheric Methanol: New Constraints on Secondary, Oceanic, and Terrestrial Sources, J. Geophys. Res., 126, doi:10.1029/2020JD033439.
-
Brock, C.A., et al. (2021), Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023-15063, doi:10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021.
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2021), Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15646-15657, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03803.
-
Decker, Z.D.-.N., et al. (2021), Nighttime and daytime dark oxidation chemistry in wildfire plumes: an observation and model analysis of FIREX-AQ aircraft data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16293-16317, doi:10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021.
-
Guo, H., et al. (2021), Heterogeneity and chemical reactivity of the remote troposphere defined by aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13729-13746, doi:10.5194/acp-21-13729-2021.
-
Hilario, M.R.A., et al. (2021), Measurement report: Long-range transport patterns into the tropical northwest Pacific during the CAMP2Ex aircraft campaign: chemical composition, size distributions, and the impact of convection, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3777-3802, doi:10.5194/acp-21-3777-2021.
-
Hintsa, E.J., et al. (2021), UAS Chromatograph for Atmospheric Trace Species (UCATS) – a versatile instrument for trace gas measurements on airborne platforms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6795-6819, doi:10.5194/amt-14-6795-2021.
-
Liao, J., et al. (2021), Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ), Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021.
-
Liu, S., et al. (2021), Sea spray aerosol concentration modulated by sea surface temperature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2020583118.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2021), Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere, Commun Earth Environ, 2, doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00164-0.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2021), Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201-11224, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021.
-
Thompson, C., et al. (2021), The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1.
-
Wang, S., et al. (2021), Chemical Tomography in a Fresh Wildland Fire Plume: A Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Study, J. Geophys. Res..
-
Wiggins, E.B., et al. (2021), Reconciling assumptions in bottom-up and top-down approaches for estimating aerosol emission rates from wildland fires using observations from FIREX-AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JD035692, doi:10.1029/2021JD035692.
-
Williamson, C.J., et al. (2021), Large hemispheric difference in nucleation mode aerosol concentrations in the lowermost stratosphere at mid and high latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9065-9088, doi:10.5194/acp-21-9065-2021.
-
Zhou, D.K., et al. (2021), Wildfire-Induced CO Plume Observations From NAST-I During the FIREX-AQ Field Campaign, IEEE Journal Of Selected Topics In Applied Earth Observations And Remote Sensing, 14, 2901-2910, doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3059855.
-
Bourgeois, I.E.V., et al. (2020), Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions., Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-2020-315.
-
Brune, W.H., et al. (2020), Exploring Oxidation in the Remote Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031685.
-
Cuchiara, G.C., et al. (2020), Vertical Transport, Entrainment, and Scavenging Processes Affecting Trace Gases in a Modeled and Observed SEAC4RS Case Study, J. Geophys. Res., 125, doi:10.1029/2019JD031957.
-
Eck, T.F., et al. (2020), Influence of cloud, fog, and high relative humidity during pollution transport events in South Korea: Aerosol properties and PM2.5 variability, Atmos. Environ., 232, 117530, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117530.
-
Gaubert, B., et al. (2020), Correcting model biases of CO in East Asia: impact on oxidant distributions during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14617-14647, doi:10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020.
-
Hannun, R.A., et al. (2020), Spatial heterogeneity in CO2, CH4, and energy fluxes: insights from airborne eddy covariance measurements over the Mid-Atlantic region, Environmental Research Letters., 15, 035008, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab7391.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2020), Assessment of Observational Evidence for Direct Convective Hydration of the Lower Stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JD032793, doi:10.1029/2020JD032793.
-
Jordan, C.E., et al. (2020), Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, 8, 28, doi:10.1525/elementa.424.
-
Saide Peralta, P.E., et al. (2020), Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6455-6478, doi:10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020.
-
Schroeder, J.R., et al. (2020), Observation-based modeling of ozone chemistry in the Seoul metropolitan area during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ), Elem Sci Anth, 8, doi:10.1525/elementa.400.
-
Souri, A., et al. (2020), Revisiting the effectiveness of HCHO/NO2 ratios for inferring ozone sensitivity to its precursors using high resolution airborne remote sensing observations in a high ozone episode during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Environ., 224, 117341, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117341.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2020), Assessing Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) carbon monoxide retrievals over urban versus non-urban regions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1337-1356, doi:10.5194/amt-13-1337-2020.
-
Thames, A.B., et al. (2020), Missing OH reactivity in the global marine boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4013-4029, doi:10.5194/acp-20-4013-2020.
-
Travis, K., et al. (2020), Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753-7781, doi:10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020.
-
Wang, S., et al. (2020), Global Atmospheric Budget of Acetone: Air‐Sea Exchange and the Contribution to Hydroxyl Radicals, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JD032553, doi:10.1029/2020JD032553.
-
Halliday, H.S., et al. (2019), Using Short‐Term CO/CO2 Ratios to Assess Air Mass Differences Over the Korean Peninsula During KORUS‐AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10,951-10,972, doi:10.1029/2018JD029697.
-
Murphy, D., et al. (2019), The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4093-4104, doi:10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019.
-
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2019), Aerosol–Cloud–Meteorology Interaction Airborne Field Investigations: Using Lessons Learned from the U.S. West Coast in the Design of ACTIVATE off the U.S. East Coast, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1511-1528, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0100.1.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2019), Source Contributions to Carbon Monoxide Concentrations During KORUS‐AQ Based on CAM‐chem Model Applications, J. Geophys. Res..
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2019), Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.1821661116.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2019), ATom: Column-Integrated Densities of Hydroxyl and Formaldehyde in Remote Troposphere, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1669.
-
Brune, W.H., et al. (2018), Atmospheric oxidation in the presence of clouds during the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14493-14510, doi:10.5194/acp-18-14493-2018.
-
Cheng, Y., et al. (2018), Estimator of Surface Ozone Using Formaldehyde and Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Over the Eastern United States in Summer, J. Geophys. Res., 123, doi:10.1029/2018JD028452.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2018), Heterogeneous ice nucleation in the tropical tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2018JD028949.
-
Lamb, K.D., et al. (2018), Estimating Source Region Influences on Black Carbon Abundance, Microphysics, and Radiative Effect Observed Over South Korea, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 13,527-13,548, doi:10.1029/2018JD029257.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2018), Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769-17800, doi:10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018.
-
Oh, Y., et al. (2018), Characteristics of greenhouse gas concentrations derived from ground-based FTS spectra at Anmyeondo, South Korea, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2361-2374, doi:10.5194/amt-11-2361-2018.
-
Tang, W., et al. (2018), Evaluating high-resolution forecasts of atmospheric CO and CO2 from a global prediction system during KORUS-AQ field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11007-11030, doi:10.5194/acp-18-11007-2018.
-
Wofsy, S., et al. (2018), ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1581.
-
Wolfe, G.M., et al. (2018), The NASA Carbon Airborne Flux Experiment (CARAFE): instrumentation and methodology, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1757-1776, doi:10.5194/amt-11-1757-2018.
-
Cheng, Y., et al. (2017), Large biogenic contribution to boundary layer O3-CO regression slope in summer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, doi:10.1002/2017GL074405.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2017), The NASA Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX): High-altitude aircraft measurements in the tropical western Pacific, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 12/2015, 129-144, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00263.1.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2017), Physical processes controlling the spatial distributions of relative humidity in the tropical tropopause layer over the Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6094-6107, doi:10.1002/2017JD026632.
-
Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
-
Nault, B.A., et al. (2017), Lightning NOx Emissions: Reconciling Measured and Modeled Estimates With Updated NOx Chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9479-9488, doi:10.1002/2017GL074436.
-
Perring, A.E., et al. (2017), In situ measurements of water uptake by black carbon-containing aerosol in wildfire plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 1086-1097, doi:10.1002/2016JD025688.
-
Twohy, C.H., et al. (2017), Saharan dust, convective lofting, aerosol enhancement zones, and potential impacts on ice nucleation in the tropical upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8833-8851, doi:10.1002/2017JD026933.
-
Beyersdorf, A., et al. (2016), The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on aerosol extinction variability in the Baltimore–Washington, D.C. region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1003-1015, doi:10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016.
-
Brock, C.A., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4987-5007, doi:10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016.
-
Brock, C.A., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009-5019, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016.
-
Cai, C., et al. (2016), Simulating reactive nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and ozone in California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008 with high wildfire activity, Atmos. Environ., 128, 28-44, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.031.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2016), On the Susceptibility of Cold Tropical Cirrus to Ice Nuclei Abundance, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2445-2464, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0274.1.
-
Liu, X., et al. (2016), Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7383-7414, doi:10.1002/2016JD025040.
-
Müller, M., et al. (2016), In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a small biomass burning plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3813-3824, doi:10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016.
-
Ott, L., et al. (2016), Frequency and impact of summertime stratospheric intrusions over Maryland during DISCOVER-AQ (2011): New evidence from NASA’s GEOS-5 simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 3687-3706, doi:10.1002/2015JD024052.
-
Yates, E.L., et al. (2016), Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire, Atmos. Environ., 127, 293-302, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038.
-
Zamora, L.M., et al. (2016), Aircraft-measured indirect cloud effects from biomass burning smoke in the Arctic and subarctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 715-738, doi:10.5194/acp-16-715-2016.
-
Zhang, Y., et al. (2016), Large vertical gradient of reactive nitrogen oxides in the boundary layer: Modeling analysis of DISCOVER-AQ 2011 observations, J. Geophys. Res., 121, doi:10.1002/2015JD024203.
-
Apel, E.C., et al. (2015), Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2505-2523, doi:10.1002/2014JD022121.
-
Barth, M.C., et al. (2015), The Deep Convective Clouds And Chemistry (Dc3) Field Campaign, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1281-1310.
-
Emmons, L.K., et al. (2015), The POLARCAT Model Intercomparison Project (POLMIP): overview and evaluation with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6721-6744, doi:10.5194/acp-15-6721-2015.
-
Forrister, H., et al. (2015), Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623-4630, doi:10.1002/2015GL063897.
-
Liu, J., et al. (2015), Brown carbon aerosol in the North American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841-7858, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015.
-
Monks, S.A., et al. (2015), Multi-model study of chemical and physical controls on transport of anthropogenic and biomass burning pollution to the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3575-3603, doi:10.5194/acp-15-3575-2015.
-
Saide Peralta, P.E., et al. (2015), Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a multiplatform inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3609-3618, doi:10.1002/2015GL063737.
-
Wagner, N.L., et al. (2015), In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7085-7102, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015.
-
Yang, Q., et al. (2015), Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 8448-8468, doi:10.1002/2015JD023647.
-
He, H., et al. (2014), An elevated reservoir of air pollutants over the Mid-Atlantic States during the 2011 DISCOVER-AQ campaign: Airborne measurements and numerical simulations, Atmos. Environ., 85, 18-30, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.039.
-
HEYMSFIELD, A.J., et al. (2014), Relationships between Ice Water Content and Volume Extinction Coefficient from In Situ Observations for Temperatures from 08 to 2868C: Implications for Spaceborne Lidar Retrievals*, J. Appl. Meteor. Climat., 53, 479-505, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-087.1.
-
Muhlbauer, A., et al. (2014), Impact of large-scale dynamics on the microphysical properties of midlatitude cirrus, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3976-3996, doi:10.1002/2013JD020035.
-
Rollins, A.W., et al. (2014), Evaluation of UT/LS hygrometer accuracy by intercomparison during the NASA MACPEX mission, J. Geophys. Res., 119, doi:10.1002/2013JD020817.
-
Thompson, A.M., et al. (2014), Ozone profiles in the Baltimore-Washington region (2006–2011): satellite comparisons and DISCOVER-AQ observations, J Atmos Chem, 72, 393-422, doi:10.1007/s10874-014-9283-z.
-
Ueyama, R., et al. (2014), Dehydration in the tropical tropopause layer: A case study for model evaluation using aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 5299-5316, doi:10.1002/2013JD021381.
-
Bian, H., et al. (2013), Source attributions of pollution to the Western Arctic during the NASA ARCTAS field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4707-4721, doi:10.5194/acp-13-4707-2013.
-
Browne, E.C., et al. (2013), Observations of total RONO2 over the boreal forest: NOx sinks and HNO3 sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4543-4562, doi:10.5194/acp-13-4543-2013.
-
Jensen, E.J., et al. (2013), Ice nucleation and dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.1217104110.
-
Apel, E.C., et al. (2012), Impact of the deep convection of isoprene and other reactive trace species on radicals and ozone in the upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1135-1150, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1135-2012.
-
Choi, ., et al. (2012), Analysis of satellite-derived Arctic tropospheric BrO columns in conjunction with aircraft measurements during ARCTAS and ARCPAC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1255-1285, doi:10.5194/acp-12-1255-2012.
-
Dupont, ., et al. (2012), Attribution and evolution of ozone from Asian wild fires using satellite and aircraft measurements during the ARCTAS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 169-188, doi:10.5194/acp-12-169-2012.
-
Klonecki, A., et al. (2012), Assimilation of IASI satellite CO fields into a global chemistry transport model for validation against aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4493-4512, doi:10.5194/acp-12-4493-2012.
-
Olson, J.R., et al. (2012), An analysis of fast photochemistry over high northern latitudes during spring and summer using in-situ observations from ARCTAS and TOPSE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6799-6825, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6799-2012.
-
Sahu, ., et al. (2012), Emission characteristics of black carbon in anthropogenic and biomass burning plumes over California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16302, doi:10.1029/2011JD017401.
-
Vogelmann, A.M., et al. (2012), Racoro Extended-Term Aircraft Observations Of Boundary Layer Clouds, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 861-878, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00189.1.
-
Wennberg, P., et al. (2012), On the Sources of Methane to the Los Angeles Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9282-9289, doi:10.1021/es301138y.
-
Carn, S.A., et al. (2011), In situ measurements of tropospheric volcanic plumes in Ecuador and Colombia during TC4, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D00J24, doi:10.1029/2010JD014718.
-
Chen, G., et al. (2011), Observations of Saharan dust microphysical and optical properties from the Eastern Atlantic during NAMMA airborne field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 723-740, doi:10.5194/acp-11-723-2011.
-
Cubison, M.J., et al. (2011), Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049-12064, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011.
-
Fried, A., et al. (2011), Detailed comparisons of airborne formaldehyde measurements with box models during the 2006 INTEX-B and MILAGRO campaigns: potential evidence for significant impacts of unmeasured and multi-generation volatile organic carbon compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11867-11894, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11867-2011.
-
Hecobian, A., et al. (2011), Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325-13337, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011.
-
Hornbrook, R.S., et al. (2011), Observations of nonmethane organic compounds during ARCTAS – Part 1: Biomass burning emissions and plume enhancements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11103-11130, doi:10.5194/acp-11-11103-2011.
-
Kondo, Y., et al. (2011), Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, doi:10.1029/2010JD015152.
-
Liang, Q., et al. (2011), Reactive nitrogen, ozone and ozone production in the Arctic troposphere and the impact of stratosphere-troposphere exchange, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13181-13199, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13181-2011.
-
Matsui, ., et al. (2011), Seasonal variation of the transport of black carbon aerosol from the Asian continent to the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05202, doi:10.1029/2010JD015067.
-
Matsui, ., et al. (2011), Accumulation‐mode aerosol number concentrations in the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign: Long‐range transport of polluted and clean air from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20217, doi:10.1029/2011JD016189.
-
McHaughton, C.S., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosols in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ACTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
-
McNaughton, ., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7561-2011.
-
Pfister, G., et al. (2011), CO source contribution analysis for California during ARCTAS-CARB., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7515-7532, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
-
Simpson, I.J., et al. (2011), Boreal forest fire emissions in fresh Canadian smoke plumes: C1-C10 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO2, CO, NO2, NO, HCN and CH3CN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6445-6463, doi:10.5194/acp-11-6445-2011.
-
Alvarado, M.J., et al. (2010), Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9739-9760, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9739-2010.
-
Avery, M.A., et al. (2010), Convective distribution of tropospheric ozone and tracers in the Central American ITCZ region: Evidence from observations during TC4, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J21, doi:10.1029/2009JD013450.
-
Croteau, P., et al. (2010), Effect of local and regional sources on the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide in the tropical free troposphere and tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J11, doi:10.1029/2009JD013117.
-
Fisher, J.A., et al. (2010), Source attribution and interannual variability of Arctic pollution in spring constrained by aircraft (ARCTAS, ARCPAC) and satellite (AIRS) observations of carbon monoxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 977-996, doi:10.5194/acp-10-977-2010.
-
Perring, A.E., et al. (2010), Alkylnitrate production and persistence in Mexico City plumes, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 23755-23790.
-
Perring, A.E., et al. (2010), The production and persistence of ΣRONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215-7229, doi:10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010.
-
Pommier, M.K., et al. (2010), IASI carbon monoxide validation over Arctic during POLARCAT spring and summer campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 14445-14494.
-
Thompson, A.M., et al. (2010), Convective and wave signatures in ozone profiles over the equatorial Americas: Views from TC4 2007 and SHADOZ, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J23, doi:10.1029/2009JD012909.
-
Tilmes, S., et al. (2010), An aircraft-based upper troposphere lower stratosphere O3, CO and H2O climatology for the Northern Hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res.(submitted).
-
Warner, J.X., et al. (2010), Improved agreement of AIRS tropospheric carbon monoxide products with other EOS sensors using optimal estimation retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9521-9533, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9521-2010.
-
Mao, J., et al. (2009), Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 163-173, doi:10.5194/acp-9-163-2009.
-
Millet, D., et al. (2009), Halocarbon Emissions from the United States and Mexico and Their Global Warming Potential, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1055-1060, doi:10.1021/es802146j.
-
Vay, S., et al. (2009), Sources and Transport of Δ14C in CO2 within the Mexico City Basin and vicinity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4973-4985.
-
Choi, Y., et al. (2008), Characteristics of the atmospheric CO2 signal as observed over the conterminous United States during INTEX-NA, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D07301.
-
Fried, A., et al. (2008), Role of convection in redistributing formaldehyde to the upper troposphere over North America and the North Atlantic during the summer 2004 INTEX campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17306, doi:10.1029/2007JD009760.
-
Livesey, N.J., et al. (2008), Validation of Aura Microwaver Limb Sounder O 3 and CO observations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S02, doi:10.1029/2007JD008805.
-
Livingston, J.M., et al. (2008), Comparison of Water Vapor Measurements by Airborne Sun Photometer and Diode Laser Hygrometer on the NASA DC-8, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 1733-1743, doi:10.1175/2008JTECHA1047.1.
-
Ren, ., et al. (2008), HOx chemistry during INTEX-A 2004: Observation, model calculation, and comparison with previous studies, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D05310, doi:10.1029/2007JD009166.
-
Kim, S., et al. (2007), Measurement of HO2NO2 in the free troposphere during the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–North America 2004, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12S01, doi:10.1029/2006JD007676.
-
Eisele, F., et al. (2003), Summary of measurement intercomparisons during TRACE-P, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8791, doi:10.1029/2002JD003167.
Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.