The IMPACTS website is undergoing a major upgrade that began Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Until that time, the current site will be visible but logins are disabled.

IMPACTS

Jose-Luis Jimenez

Organization:

University of Colorado, Boulder

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

Email:

Contact person by email

Business Address:

UCB 216

CIRES Bldg., Room 318

Boulder, CO 80309-0216

United States

Website:

http://cires.colorado.edu/jimenez

First Author Publications:

Jimenez-Palacios, J., et al. (2019), ATom: L2 Measurements from CU High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-AMS), Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1716.
Jimenez-Palacios, J., et al. (2016), Comment on "The effects of molecular weight and thermal decomposition on the sensitivity of a thermal desorption aerosol mass spectrometer”, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 50, 9, doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1205728.
Jimenez-Palacios, J., et al. (2009), Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525-1529, doi:10.1126/science.1180353.

Co-Authored Publications:

Decker, Z., et al. (2024), Airborne Observations Constrain Heterogeneous Nitrogen and Halogen Chemistry on Tropospheric and Stratospheric Biomass Burning Aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107273, doi:10.1029/2023GL107273.
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
Gkatzelis, G., et al. (2024), Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-929-2024.
Jenks, O. J., et al. (2024), pubs.acs.org/estair Article Effects of 222 nm Germicidal Ultraviolet Light on Aerosol and VOC Formation from Limonene, Anal. Chem., 1, 820−828, doi:10.1021/acsestair.4c00065.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2024), A multi-instrumental approach for calibrating real-time mass spectrometers using high-performance liquid chromatography and positive matrix factorization, doi:10.5194/ar-2-59-2024.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2024), Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the OH Oxidation of Phenol, Catechol, Styrene, Furfural, and Methyl Furfural, Anal. Chem., 1179, 1179−1192, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00361.
Chan, Y.-C., et al. (2023), Stratospheric gas-phase production alone cannot explain observations of atmospheric perchlorate on Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, org/10.1029/2023GL102745, doi:10.1029/2023GL102745.
Jeon, S., et al. (2023), A searchable database and mass spectral comparison tool for the Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6075-6095, doi:10.5194/amt-16-6075-2023.
Jo, D., et al. (2023), Global Health and Climate Effects of Organic Aerosols from Different Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 13793-13807, doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c02823.
June, N. A., et al. (2023), Aerosol size distribution changes in FIREX-AQ biomass burning plumes: the impact of plume concentration on coagulation and OA condensation/evaporation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-12803-2022.
Katich, J., et al. (2023), Pyrocumulonimbus affect average stratospheric aerosol composition, Science, 379, 815-820, doi:10.1126/science.add3101.
Kumar, A., et al. (2023), Simulating wildfire emissions and plume rise using geostationary satellite fire radiative power measurements: a case study of the 2019 Williams Flats fire, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-10195-2022.
Nihill, K. J., et al. (2023), Evolution of organic carbon in the laboratory oxidation of biomass-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-7887-2023.
Pagonis, D., et al. (2023), Impact of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol Volatility on Smoke Concentrations Downwind of Fires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 17011-17021, doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c05017.
Rickly, P., et al. (2023), Emission factors and evolution of SO2 measured from biomass burning in wildfires and agricultural fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2023), Understanding the Evolution of Smoke Mass Extinction Efficiency Using Field Campaign Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099175, doi:10.1029/2022GL099175.
Shah, V., et al. (2023), Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023.
Siemens, K. S. A., et al. (2023), Probing Atmospheric Aerosols by Multimodal Mass Spectrometry Techniques: Revealing Aging Characteristics of Its Individual Molecular Components, Anal. Chem., 2498, 2498−2510, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00228.
Tang, Y., et al. (2023), Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign, Geosci. Model. Dev., doi:10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022.
Tomsche, L., et al. (2023), Measurement report: Emission factors of NH3 and NHx for wildfires and agricultural fires in the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023.
Travis, K. R., et al. (2023), Emission Factors for Crop Residue and Prescribed Fires in the Eastern US during FIREX-AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 128, e2023JD039309, doi:10.1029/2023JD039309.
Warneke, C., et al. (2023), Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ), J. Geophys. Res., 128, e2022JD037758, doi:10.1029/2022JD037758.
Zhu, H., et al. (2023), Parameterization of size of organic and secondary inorganic aerosol for efficient representation of global aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-5023-2023.
Adachi, K., et al. (2022), Fine ash-bearing particles as a major aerosol component in biomass burning smoke, J. Geophys. Res., 127, e2021JD035657, doi:10.1029/2021JD035657.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi:10.1073/pnas.2109628118.
Bourgeois, I., et al. (2022), Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO2, HONO, NOy , and CO during FIREX-AQ, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901-4930, doi:10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022.
Day, D. A., et al. (2022), A systematic re-evaluation of methods for quantification of bulk particle-phase organic nitrates using real-time aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 459-483, doi:10.5194/amt-15-459-2022.
Fung, K. M., et al. (2022), Exploring dimethyl sulfide (DMS) oxidation and implications for global aerosol radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-1549-2022.
Kacenelenbogen, M. S., et al. (2022), Identifying chemical aerosol signatures using optical suborbital observations: how much can optical properties tell us about aerosol composition?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-3713-2022.
Kim, D., et al. (2022), Field observational constraints on the controllers in glyoxal (CHOCHO) reactive uptake to aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-805-2022.
Lee, Y. R., et al. (2022), An investigation of petrochemical emissions during KORUS-AQ: Ozone production, reactive nitrogen evolution, and aerosol production. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 10, 00079-24, doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00079.
Oak, Y. J., et al. (2022), Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Simulations for Seoul, Korea, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst..
Peterson, D., et al. (2022), Measurements from inside a Thunderstorm Driven by Wildfire: The 2019 FIREX-AQ Field Experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 103, E2140-E2167, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0049.1.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2022), Understanding the Evolution of Smoke Mass Extinction Efficiency Using Field Campaign Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099175, doi:10.1029/2022GL099175.
Schwantes, R., et al. (2022), Evaluating the Impact of Chemical Complexity and Horizontal Resolution on Tropospheric Ozone Over the Conterminous US With a Global Variable Resolution Chemistry Model, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 14, e2021MS002889, doi:10.1029/2021MS002889.
Stockwell, C. E., et al. (2022), Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7564-7577, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c07121.
Wolfe, G. M., et al. (2022), Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022.
Xu, L., et al. (2022), Adv.7, eabl3648 (2021) 8 December 2021SCIENCE ADVANCES, Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes, Xu et al., Sci., 7, eabl3648, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3648.
Zeng, L., et al. (2022), Characteristics and evolution of brown carbon in western United States wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8009-2022.
Brock, C., et al. (2021), Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023-15063, doi:10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021.
Chen, X., et al. (2021), HCOOH in the Remote Atmosphere: Constraints from Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Airborne Observations, ACS Earth Space Chem., doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00049.
Decker, Z., et al. (2021), Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 15646-15657, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c03803.
Gonzalez, Y., et al. (2021), Impact of stratospheric air and surface emissions on tropospheric nitrous oxide during ATom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11113-11132, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11113-2021.
Guo, H., et al. (2021), The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: a case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3631-3655, doi:10.5194/amt-14-3631-2021.
Jo, D. S., et al. (2021), Future changes in isoprene-epoxydiol-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX SOA) under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: the importance of physicochemical dependency, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3395-3425, doi:10.5194/acp-21-3395-2021.
Kenagy, H., et al. (2021), Contribution of Organic Nitrates to Organic Aerosol over South Korea during KORUS-AQ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 16326-16338, doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05521.
Moore, R., et al. (2021), Sizing response of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) and Laser Aerosol Spectrometer (LAS) to changes in submicron aerosol composition and refractive index, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4517-4542, doi:10.5194/amt-14-4517-2021.
Nair, A. A., et al. (2021), Machine learning uncovers aerosol size information from chemistry and meteorology to quantify potential cloud-forming particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., doi:10.1029/2021GL094133.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere, Commun Earth Environ, 2, doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00164-0.
Nault, B., et al. (2021), Secondary organic aerosols from anthropogenic volatile organic compounds contribute substantially to air pollution mortality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201-11224, doi:10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021.
Pagonis, D., et al. (2021), Airborne extractive electrospray mass spectrometry measurements of the chemical composition of organic aerosol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1545-1559, doi:10.5194/amt-14-1545-2021.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2021), Aerosol pH Indicator and Organosulfate Detectability from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry Measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., doi:10.5194/amt-2020-339.
Schueneman, M., et al. (2021), Aerosol pH indicator and organosulfate detectability from aerosol mass spectrometry measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2237-2260, doi:10.5194/amt-14-2237-2021.
Thompson, C., et al. (2021), The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0315.1.
Wiggins, E. B., et al. (2021), Reconciling assumptions in bottom-up and top-down approaches for estimating aerosol emission rates from wildland fires using observations from FIREX-AQ, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JD035692, doi:10.1029/2021JD035692.
Zhai, S., et al. (2021), Relating geostationary satellite measurements of aerosol optical depth (AOD) over East Asia to fine particulate matter (PM2.5): insights from the KORUS-AQ aircraft campaign and GEOS-Chem model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16775-16791, doi:10.5194/acp-21-16775-2021.
Carter, T. S., et al. (2020), How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2073-2097, doi:10.5194/acp-20-2073-2020.
Fairlie, T. D., et al. (2020), Estimates of Regional Source Contributions to the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer Using a Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res., 125, 4-20, doi:10.1029/2019JD031506.
Heim, E. W., et al. (2020), Asian dust observed during KORUS-AQ facilitates the uptake and incorporation of soluble pollutants during transport to South Korea, Atmos. Environ., 224, 117305, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117305.
Hodzic, A., et al. (2020), Characterization of organic aerosol across the global remote troposphere: a comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4607-4635, doi:10.5194/acp-20-4607-2020.
Hu, W., et al. (2020), Ambient Quantification and Size Distributions for Organic Aerosol in Aerosol Mass Spectrometers with the New Capture Vaporizer, Anal. Chem., 676, 676−689, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00310.
Jordan, C. E., et al. (2020), Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, 8, 28, doi:10.1525/elementa.424.
Koenig, T., et al. (2020), Quantitative detection of iodine in the stratosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, doi:10.1073/pnas.1916828117.
Lou, S., et al. (2020), New SOA Treatments Within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM): Strong Production and Sinks Govern Atmospheric SOA Distributions and Radiative Forcing, J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 12, e2020MS002266, doi:10.1029/2020MS002266.
Nault, B., et al. (2020), Interferences with aerosol acidity quantification due to gas-phase ammonia uptake onto acidic sulfate filter samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6193-6213, doi:10.5194/amt-13-6193-2020.
Pai, S. J., et al. (2020), An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2637-2665, doi:10.5194/acp-20-2637-2020.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2020), Understanding and improving model representation of aerosol optical properties for a Chinese haze event measured during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6455-6478, doi:10.5194/acp-20-6455-2020.
Veres, P., et al. (2020), Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, doi:10.1073/pnas.1919344117.
Brock, C., et al. (2019), Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): methods, uncertainties, and data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3081-3099, doi:10.5194/amt-12-3081-2019.
Chen, Y., et al. (2019), Cite This: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5176−5186 pubs.acs.org/est Response of the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to Inorganic Sulfates and Organosulfur Compounds: Applications in Field and Laboratory Measurements, Environ. Sci. Technol., doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00884.
Froyd, K., et al. (2019), A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6209-6239, doi:10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019.
Haskins, J. D., et al. (2019), Anthropogenic Control Over Wintertime Oxidation of Atmospheric Pollutants, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14,826-14,835, doi:10.1029/2019GL085498.
Hodshire, A., et al. (2019), The potential role of methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in aerosol formation and growth and the associated radiative forcings, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3137-3160, doi:10.5194/acp-19-3137-2019.
Hodshire, A., et al. (2019), Cite This: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 10007−10022 pubs.acs.org/est Aging Effects on Biomass Burning Aerosol Mass and Composition: A Critical Review of Field and Laboratory Studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02588.
Jeong, D., et al. (2019), Integration of airborne and ground observations of nitryl chloride in the Seoul metropolitan area and the implications on regional oxidation capacity during KORUS-AQ 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12779-12795, doi:10.5194/acp-19-12779-2019.
Liao, J., et al. (2019), Towards a satellite formaldehyde – in situ hybrid estimate for organic aerosol abundance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2765-2785, doi:10.5194/acp-19-2765-2019.
Peng, Z., et al. (2019), Organic peroxy radical chemistry in oxidation flow reactors and environmental chambers and their atmospheric relevance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 813-834, doi:10.5194/acp-19-813-2019.
Shah, V., et al. (2019), Widespread Pollution From Secondary Sources of Organic Aerosols During Winter in the Northeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2974-2983, doi:10.1029/2018GL081530.
Sparks, T., et al. (2019), Comparison of Airborne Reactive Nitrogen Measurements During WINTER, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 10,483-10,502, doi:10.1029/2019JD030700.
Tilmes, S., et al. (2019), Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2), J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst., 11, 4323-4351, doi:10.1029/2019MS001827.
Wang, S., et al. (2019), Atmospheric Acetaldehyde: Importance of Air‐Sea Exchange and a Missing Source in the Remote Troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, doi:10.1029/2019GL082034.
Williamson, C., et al. (2019), ATom: In Situ Tropical Aerosol Properties and Comparable Global Model Outputs, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1684.
Williamson, C., et al. (2019), A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics, Nature, 574, 399-403, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9.
Williamson, C. J., et al. (2019), A large source of cloud condensation nuclei from new particle formation in the tropics, Nature, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1638-9.
Aldhaif, A. M., et al. (2018), Characterization of the Real Part of Dry Aerosol Refractive Index Over North America From the Surface to 12 km, J. Geophys. Res., 123, doi:10.1029/2018JD028504.
Baker, K. R., et al. (2018), Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data, Science of the Total Environment, 637–638, 1137-1149, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.048.
Ervens, B., et al. (2018), Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16099-16119, doi:10.5194/acp-18-16099-2018.
Haskins, J. D., et al. (2018), Wintertime Gas-Particle Partitioning and Speciation of Inorganic Chlorine in the Lower Troposphere Over the Northeast United States and Coastal Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,897-12,916, doi:10.1029/2018JD028786.
Hu, W., et al. (2018), Evaluation of the New Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers (AMS): Elemental Composition and Source Apportionment of Organic Aerosols (OA), Anal. Chem., 2, 410−421, doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00002.
Jaeglé, L., et al. (2018), Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, Chemistry, Deposition, and Export Over the Northeast United States During the WINTER Aircraft Campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,368-12,393, doi:10.1029/2018JD029133.
Mao, J., et al. (2018), Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2615-2651, doi:10.5194/acp-18-2615-2018.
McDuffie, E., et al. (2018), ClNO2 Yields From Aircraft Measurements During the 2015 WINTER Campaign and Critical Evaluation of the Current Parameterization, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 12,994-13,015, doi:10.1029/2018JD029358.
Nault, B., et al. (2018), Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17769-17800, doi:10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018.
Schroder, J. C., et al. (2018), Sources and Secondary Production of Organic Aerosols in the Northeastern United States during WINTER, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 7771-7796, doi:10.1029/2018JD028475.
Shah, V., et al. (2018), Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115, 8110-8115, doi:10.1073/pnas.1803295115.
Wang, X., et al. (2018), Exploring the observational constraints on the simulation of brown carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 635-653, doi:10.5194/acp-18-635-2018.
Wofsy, S. C., et al. (2018), ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Ornl Daac, doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1581.
Xu, W., et al. (2018), Laboratory evaluation of species- dependent relative ionization efficiencies in the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 6, doi:10.1080/02786826.2018.1439570.
Hu, W., et al. (2017), Evaluation of the new Capture Vaporizer for Aerosol Mass Spectrometers (AMS) through field studies of inorganic species, Aerosol Sci. Tech., doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1296104.
Hu, W., et al. (2017), Evaluation of the new capture vapourizer for aerosol mass spectrometers (AMS) through laboratory studies of inorganic species, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2897-2921.
Liu, X., et al. (2017), Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 6108-6129, doi:10.1002/2016JD026315.
Perring, A., et al. (2017), In situ measurements of water uptake by black carbon-containing aerosol in wildfire plumes, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 1086-1097, doi:10.1002/2016JD025688.
Silvern, R. F., et al. (2017), Inconsistency of ammonium–sulfate aerosol ratios with thermodynamic models in the eastern US: a possible role of organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5107-5118, doi:10.5194/acp-17-5107-2017.
Sorooshian, A., et al. (2017), Contrasting aerosol refractive index and hygroscopicity in the inflow and outflow of deep convective storms: Analysis of airborne data from DC3, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4565-4577, doi:10.1002/2017JD026638.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2017), Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon in the upper troposphere, Nature Geoscience, 10, 486, doi:10.1038/NGEO2960.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4987-5007, doi:10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016.
Brock, C., et al. (2016), Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 2: Sensitivity of aerosol optical depth to relative humidity and aerosol parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5009-5019, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5009-2016.
Cai, C., et al. (2016), Simulating reactive nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and ozone in California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008 with high wildfire activity, Atmos. Environ., 128, 28-44, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.031.
Fisher, J. A., et al. (2016), Organic nitrate chemistry and its implications for nitrogen budgets in an isoprene- and monoterpene-rich atmosphere: constraints from aircraft (SEAC4RS) and ground-based (SOAS) observations in the Southeast US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5969-5991, doi:10.5194/acp-16-5969-2016.
Hodzic, A., et al. (2016), Rethinking the global secondary organic aerosol (SOA) budget: stronger production, faster removal, shorter lifetime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7917-7941, doi:10.5194/acp-16-7917-2016.
Hu, W., et al. (2016), Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambient isoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11563-11580, doi:10.5194/acp-16-11563-2016.
Liu, X., et al. (2016), Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7383-7414, doi:10.1002/2016JD025040.
Marais, E. A., et al. (2016), Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO2 emission controls, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1603-1618, doi:10.5194/acp-16-1603-2016.
Nault, B., et al. (2016), Observational Constraints on the Oxidation of NOx in the Upper Troposphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 1468-1478, doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824.
Peng, Z., et al. (2016), Non-OH chemistry in oxidation flow reactors for the study of atmospheric chemistry systematically examined by modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4283-4305, doi:10.5194/acp-16-4283-2016.
Pieber, S. M., et al. (2016), Inorganic Salt Interference on CO2+ in Aerodyne AMS and ACSM Organic Aerosol Composition Studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10494-10503, doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b01035.
Ridley, A., et al. (2016), Evaluating model parameterizations of submicron aerosol scattering and absorption with in situ data from ARCTAS 2008 Matthew J. Alvarado1 , Chantelle R. Lonsdale1 , Helen L. Macintyre2,a , Huisheng Bian3,4 , Mian Chin4 , David, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9435-9455, doi:10.5194/acp-16-9435-2016.
Shingler, T., et al. (2016), Airborne characterization of subsaturated aerosol hygroscopicity and dry refractive index from the surface to 6.5km during the SEAC4RS campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4188-4210, doi:10.1002/2015JD024498.
Shingler, T., et al. (2016), Ambient observations of hygroscopic growth factor and f(RH) below 1: Case studies from surface and airborne measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 121, doi:10.1002/2016JD025471.
Yates, E., et al. (2016), Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire, Atmos. Environ., 127, 293-302, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038.
Yu, P., et al. (2016), Surface dimming by the 2013 Rim Fire simulated by a sectional aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 7079-7087, doi:10.1002/2015JD024702.
Zamora, L., et al. (2016), Aircraft-measured indirect cloud effects from biomass burning smoke in the Arctic and subarctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 715-738, doi:10.5194/acp-16-715-2016.
Barth, M. C., et al. (2015), The Deep Convective Clouds And Chemistry (Dc3) Field Campaign, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1281-1310.
Canagaratna, M. R., et al. (2015), Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253-272, doi:10.5194/acp-15-253-2015.
Chen, Q., et al. (2015), Submicron particle mass concentrations and sources in the Amazonian wet season (AMAZE-08), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3687-3701, doi:10.5194/acp-15-3687-2015.
Chen, Q., et al. (2015), Elemental composition of organic aerosol: The gap between ambient and laboratory measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4182-4189, doi:10.1002/2015GL063693.
Cubison, M. J., and J. Jimenez-Palacios (2015), Statistical precision of the intensities retrieved from constrained fitting of overlapping peaks in high-resolution mass spectra, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2333-2345, doi:10.5194/amt-8-2333-2015.
Forrister, H., et al. (2015), Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4623-4630, doi:10.1002/2015GL063897.
Hodzic, A., et al. (2015), Organic photolysis reactions in tropospheric aerosols: effect on secondary organic aerosol formation and lifetime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9253-9269, doi:10.5194/acp-15-9253-2015.
Hu, W., et al. (2015), Characterization of a real-time tracer for isoprene epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA) from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11807-11833, doi:10.5194/acp-15-11807-2015.
Kim, P., et al. (2015), Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10411-10433, doi:10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015.
Liao, J., et al. (2015), Airborne organosulfates measurements over the continental US, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2990-3005, doi:10.1002/2014JD022378.
Liu, J., et al. (2015), Brown carbon aerosol in the North American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7841-7858, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7841-2015.
Saide Peralta, et al. (2015), Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a multiplatform inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3609-3618, doi:10.1002/2015GL063737.
Shrivastava, M., et al. (2015), Global transformation and fate of SOA: Implications of low-volatility SOA and gas-phase fragmentation reactions, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 4169-4195, doi:10.1002/2014JD022563.
Wagner, N. L., et al. (2015), In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7085-7102, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015.
Washenfelder, R. A., et al. (2015), Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653-664, doi:0.1002/2014GL062444.
Yang, Q., et al. (2015), Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 8448-8468, doi:10.1002/2015JD023647.
Howell, S., et al. (2014), An airborne assessment of atmospheric particulate emissions from the processing of Athabasca oil sands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5073-5087, doi:10.5194/acp-14-5073-2014.
Tsigaridis, K., et al. (2014), The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845-10895, doi:10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014.
Browne, E. C., et al. (2013), Observations of total RONO2 over the boreal forest: NOx sinks and HNO3 sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4543-4562, doi:10.5194/acp-13-4543-2013.
Docherty, K. S., et al. (2013), Collection Efficiency of the Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Chamber-Generated Secondary Organic Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 294-309, doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.752572.
Lathem, T. L., et al. (2013), Analysis of CCN activity of Arctic aerosol and Canadian biomass burning during summer 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2735-2756, doi:10.5194/acp-13-2735-2013.
Ryerson, T. B., et al. (2013), The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5830-5866, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50331.
Corr, C. A., et al. (2012), Spectral absorption of biomass burning aerosol determined from retrieved single scattering albedo during ARCTAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10505-10518, doi:10.5194/acp-12-10505-2012.
Huang, M., et al. (2012), Sectoral and geographical contributions to summertime continental United States (CONUS) black carbon spatial distributions, Atmos. Environ., 51, 165-174, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.021.
Jolleys, M. D., et al. (2012), Characterizing the Aging of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol by Use of Mixing Ratios: A Meta-analysis of Four Regions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 13093-13102, doi:10.1021/es302386v.
Middlebrook, A. M., et al. (2012), Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data, Aerosol Science and Technology, 46, 258-271, doi:10.1080/02786826.2011.620041.
Sahu, L., et al. (2012), Emission characteristics of black carbon in anthropogenic and biomass burning plumes over California during ARCTAS-CARB 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D16302, doi:10.1029/2011JD017401.
Bon, D. M., et al. (2011), Measurements of volatile organic compounds at a suburban ground site (T1) in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 campaign: measurement comparison, emission ratios, and source attribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2399-2421, doi:10.5194/acp-11-2399-2011.
Cubison, M. J., et al. (2011), Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049-12064, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011.
Docherty, K. S., et al. (2011), The 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols at Riverside (SOAR-1): instrumental intercomparisons and fine particle composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12387-12420, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12387-2011.
Farmer, D. K., et al. (2011), Eddy covariance measurements with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry: a new approach to chemically resolved aerosol fluxes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1275-1289, doi:10.5194/amt-4-1275-2011.
Fisher, J. A., et al. (2011), Sources, distribution, and acidity of sulfateeammonium aerosol in the Arctic in winterespring, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7301-7318, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.030.
Heald, C. L., et al. (2011), Exploring the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft field campaigns with a global model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12673-12696, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12673-2011.
Hecobian, A., et al. (2011), Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13325-13337, doi:10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011.
Huang, M., et al. (2011), Multi-scale modeling study of the source contributions to near-surface ozone and sulfur oxides levels over California during the ARCTAS-CARB period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3173-3194, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3173-2011.
Kimmel, J. R., et al. (2011), Real-time aerosol mass spectrometry with millisecond resolution, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 303, 15-26, doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2010.12.004.
Kondo, Y., et al. (2011), Emissions of black carbon, organic, and inorganic aerosols from biomass burning in North America and Asia in 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D08204, doi:10.1029/2010JD015152.
Matsui, H., et al. (2011), Accumulation‐mode aerosol number concentrations in the Arctic during the ARCTAS aircraft campaign: Long‐range transport of polluted and clean air from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20217, doi:10.1029/2011JD016189.
McHaughton, C. S., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosols in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ACTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011.
McNaughton, C. S., et al. (2011), Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7561-7582, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7561-2011.
Ng, N. L., et al. (2011), Real-Time Methods for Estimating Organic Component Mass Concentrations from Aerosol Mass Spectrometer Data, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 910-916, doi:10.1021/es102951k.
Paulot, F., et al. (2011), Importance of secondary sources in the atmospheric budgets of formic and acetic acids, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1989-2013, doi:10.5194/acp-11-1989-2011.
Robinson, C. B., et al. (2011), Thermal desorption metastable atom bombardment ionization aerosol mass spectrometer, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 303, 164-172, doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2011.01.027.
Wang, Q., et al. (2011), Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12453-12473, doi:10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011.
Adhikary, B., et al. (2010), A regional scale modeling analysis of aerosol and trace gas distributions over the eastern Pacific during the INTEX-B field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2091-2115, doi:10.5194/acp-10-2091-2010.
Adhikary, B., et al. (2010), Trans-Pacific transport and evolution of aerosols and trace gases from Asia during the INTEX-B field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 2091-2115.
Aiken, A. C., et al. (2010), Mexico city aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 2: Analysis of the biomass burning contribution and the non-fossil carbon fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5315-5341, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5315-2010.
Alvarado, M. J., et al. (2010), Nitrogen oxides and PAN in plumes from boreal fires during ARCTAS-B and their impact on ozone: an integrated analysis of aircraft and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9739-9760, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9739-2010.
DeCarlo, P. F., et al. (2010), Investigation of the sources and processing of organic aerosol over the Central Mexican Plateau from aircraft measurements during MILAGRO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5257-5280, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5257-2010.
Emmons, L., et al. (2010), Impact of Mexico City emissions on regional air quality from MOZART-4 simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6195-6212, doi:10.5194/acp-10-6195-2010.
Mao, J., et al. (2010), Chemistry of hydrogen oxide radicals (HOx) in the Arctic troposphere in spring, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5823-5838, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5823-2010.
Molina, L. T., et al. (2010), An overview of the MILAGRO 2006 Campaign: Mexico City emissions and their transport and transformation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8697-8760, doi:10.5194/acp-10-8697-2010.
Roberts, G., et al. (2010), Characterization of particle cloud droplet activity and composition in the free troposphere and the boundary layer during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6627-6644, doi:10.5194/acp-10-6627-2010.
Russell, P. B., et al. (2010), Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155-1169, doi:10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010.
Singh, H., et al. (2010), Pollution influences on atmospheric composition and chemistry at high northern latitudes: Boreal and California forest fire emissions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4553-4564, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.026.
Aiken, A. C., et al. (2009), Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) – Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6633-6653, doi:10.5194/acp-9-6633-2009.
Crounse, J. D., et al. (2009), Biomass burning and urban air pollution over the Central Mexican Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4929-4944, doi:10.5194/acp-9-4929-2009.
Dunlea, E. J., et al. (2009), Evolution of Asian aerosols during transpacific transport in INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7257-7287, doi:10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009.
Huffman, J. A., et al. (2009), Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7161-7182, doi:10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009.
Huffman, J. A., et al. (2009), Chemically-Resolved Volatility Measurements of Organic Aerosol from Different Sources, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 5351-5357, doi:10.1021/es803539d.
Lewis, K. A., et al. (2009), Reduction in biomass burning aerosol light absorption upon humidification: roles of inorganically-induced hygroscopicity, particle collapse, and photoacoustic heat and mass transfer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8949-8966, doi:10.5194/acp-9-8949-2009.
McNaughton, C. S., et al. (2009), Observations of heterogeneous reactions between Asian pollution and mineral dust over the Eastern North Pacific during INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8283-8308, doi:10.5194/acp-9-8283-2009.
Mohr, C., et al. (2009), Characterization of Primary Organic Aerosol Emissions from Meat Cooking, Trash Burning, and Motor Vehicles with High-Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry and Comparison with Ambient and Chamber Observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2443-2449, doi:10.1021/es8011518.
Paredes-Miranda, G., et al. (2009), Primary and secondary contributions to aerosol light scattering and absorption in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3721-3730, doi:10.5194/acp-9-3721-2009.
Shilling, J. E., et al. (2009), Loading-dependent elemental composition of α-pinene SOA particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 771-782, doi:10.5194/acp-9-771-2009.
Shinozuka, Y., et al. (2009), Aerosol optical properties relevant to regional remote sensing of CCN activity and links to their organic mass fraction: airborne observations over Central Mexico and the US West Coast during MILAGRO/INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6727-6742, doi:10.5194/acp-9-6727-2009.
Ulbrich, I., et al. (2009), Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2891-2918, doi:10.5194/acp-9-2891-2009.
Yokelson, R., et al. (2009), Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5785-5812, doi:10.5194/acp-9-5785-2009.
Aiken, A. C., et al. (2008), O/C and OM/OC Ratios of Primary, Secondary, and Ambient Organic Aerosols with High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4478-4485, doi:10.1021/es703009q.
Bahreini, R., et al. (2008), Design and Operation of a Pressure-Controlled Inlet for Airborne Sampling with an Aerodynamic Aerosol Lens, Aerosol Science and Technology, 42, 465-471, doi:10.1080/02786820802178514.
Cubison, M. J., et al. (2008), The influence of chemical composition and mixing state of Los Angeles urban aerosol on CCN number and cloud properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5649-5667, doi:10.5194/acp-8-5649-2008.
DeCarlo, P. F., et al. (2008), Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above Mexico City and Central Mexico during the MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4027-4048, doi:10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008.
Docherty, K. S., et al. (2008), Apportionment of Primary and Secondary Organic Aerosols in Southern California during the 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols in Riverside (SOAR-1), Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7655-7662, doi:10.1021/es8008166.
Heald, C. L., et al. (2008), Total observed organic carbon (TOOC) in the atmosphere: a synthesis of North American observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2007-2025, doi:10.5194/acp-8-2007-2008.
Heald, C. L., et al. (2008), Total observed organic carbon (TOOC) in the atmosphere: a synthesis of North American observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2007-2025.
Huffman, J. A., et al. (2008), Development and Characterization of a Fast-Stepping/Scanning Thermodenuder for Chemically-Resolved Aerosol Volatility Measurements, Aerosol Science and Technology, 42, 395-407, doi:10.1080/02786820802104981.
Johnson, K. S., et al. (2008), Comparative Analysis of Urban Atmospheric Aerosol by Particle-Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE), Proton Elastic Scattering Analysis (PESA), and Aerosol Mass Spectrometry (AMS), Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6619-6624, doi:10.1021/es800393e.
Nemitz, E., et al. (2008), An Eddy-Covariance System for the Measurement of Surface/Atmosphere Exchange Fluxes of Submicron Aerosol Chemical Species—First Application Above an Urban Area, Aerosol Science and Technology, 42, 636-657, doi:10.1080/02786820802227352.
van Donkelaar, A., et al. (2008), Analysis of aircraft and satellite measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) to quantify long-range transport of East Asian sulfur to Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2999-3014, doi:10.5194/acp-8-2999-2008.
Zheng, J., et al. (2008), Measurements of HNO3 and N2O5 using ion drift-chemical ionization mass spectrometry during the MILAGRO/MCMA-2006 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6823-6838, doi:10.5194/acp-8-6823-2008.
Aiken, A. C., P. F. DeCarlo, and J. Jimenez-Palacios (2007), Elemental Analysis of Organic Species with Electron Ionization High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 79, 8350-8358, doi:10.1021/ac071150w.
Canagaratna, M. R., et al. (2007), Chemical and Microphysical Characterization of Ambient Aerosols with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 26, 185-222, doi:10.1002/mas.20115.
Crosier, J., et al. (2007), Technical Note: Description and Use of the New Jump Mass Spectrum Mode of Operation for the Aerodyne Quadrupole Aerosol Mass Spectrometers (Q-AMS), Aerosol Science and Technology, 41, 865-872, doi:10.1080/02786820701501899.
Salcedo, D., et al. (2007), Technical Note: Use of a beam width probe in an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer to monitor particle collection efficiency in the field, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 549-556, doi:10.5194/acp-7-549-2007.
Stroud, C. A., et al. (2007), Cloud Activating Properties of Aerosol Observed during CELTIC, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 441-459, doi:10.1175/JAS3843.1.
Zhang, Q., et al. (2007), Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L13801, doi:10.1029/2007GL029979.
Zhang, Q., et al. (2007), A Case Study of Urban Particle Acidity and Its Influence on Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 3213-3219, doi:10.1021/es061812j.
DeCarlo, P. F., et al. (2006), Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281-8289, doi:10.1021/ac061249n.
Takegawa, N., et al. (2006), Seasonal and Diurnal Variations of Submicron Organic Aerosols in Tokyo Observed using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS), J. Geophys. Res., 111, D11206, doi:10.1029/2005JD006515.
Huffman, J. A., et al. (2005), Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Science and Technology, 39, 1143-1163, doi:10.1080/02786820500423782.
Zhang, Q., et al. (2005), Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289-3311, doi:10.5194/acp-5-3289-2005.
Zhang, Q., et al. (2005), Deconvolution and Quantification of Hydrocarbon-like and Oxygenated Organic Aerosols Based on Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 4938-4952, doi:10.1021/es048568l.
Conant, W. C., et al. (2004), Aerosol--cloud drop concentration closure in warm cumulus, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D13204, doi:10.1029/2003JD004324.
DeCarlo, P. F., et al. (2004), Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Science and Technology, 38, 1185-1205, doi:10.1080/027868290903907.
Slowik, J. G., et al. (2004), Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio, Aerosol Science and Technology, 38, 1206-1222, doi:10.1080/027868290903916.

Note: Only publications that have been uploaded to the ESD Publications database are listed here.

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Warning message

IMPACTS

Jose-Luis Jimenez

NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Log in to IMPACTS

Search form

Warning message

IMPACTS

Jose-Luis Jimenez