Warning message

Member access has been temporarily disabled. Please try again later.
The CAMP2Ex website is undergoing a major upgrade that began Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Until that time, the current site will be visible but logins are disabled.

Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Column Water Vapor version 4 validation...

Wang, H., A. Souri, Gonzalez Abad, X. Liu, and K. Chance (2019), Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Column Water Vapor version 4 validation and applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5183-5199, doi:10.5194/amt-12-5183-2019.
Abstract: 

Total column water vapor (TCWV) is important for the weather and climate. TCWV is derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) visible spectra using the version 4.0 retrieval algorithm developed at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. The algorithm uses a retrieval window between 432.0 and 466.5 nm and includes updates to reference spectra and water vapor profiles. The retrieval window optimization results from the trade-offs among competing factors.

The OMI product is characterized by comparing against commonly used reference datasets – global positioning system (GPS) network data over land and Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) data over the oceans. We examine how cloud fraction and cloud-top pressure affect the comparisons. The results lead us to recommend filtering OMI data with a cloud fraction less than f = 0.05–0.25 and cloud-top pressure greater than 750 mb (or stricter), in addition to the data quality flag, fitting root mean square (RMS) and TCWV range check. Over land, for f = 0.05, the overall mean of OMI–GPS is 0.32 mm with a standard deviation (σ ) of 5.2 mm; the smallest bias occurs when TCWV = 10– 20 mm, and the best regression line corresponds to f = 0.25. Over the oceans, for f = 0.05, the overall mean of OMI– SSMIS is 0.4 mm (1.1 mm) with σ = 6.5 mm (6.8 mm) for January (July); the smallest bias occurs when TCWV = 20– 30 mm, and the best regression line corresponds to f = 0.15. For both land and the oceans, the difference between OMI and the reference datasets is relatively large when TCWV is less than 10 mm. The bias for the version 4.0 OMI TCWV is much smaller than that for version 3.0.

As test applications of the version 4.0 OMI TCWV over a range of spatial and temporal scales, we find prominent signals of the patterns associated with El Niño and La Niña, the high humidity associated with a corn sweat event, and the strong moisture band of an atmospheric river (AR). A data assimilation experiment demonstrates that the OMI data can help improve the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model skill at simulating the structure and intensity of the AR and the precipitation at the AR landfall.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.
Research Program: 
Atmospheric Composition
Mission: 
Aura- OMI
Aura Science Team
TEMPO