Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.


Lightning‐generated NOx seen by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument during...

Bucsela, E. J., K. Pickering, T. L. Huntemann, R. C. Cohen, A. Perring, J. Gleason, R. Blakeslee, R. AlbrechtI, R. Holzworth, J. P. Cipriani, D. Vargas‐Navarro, I. Mora‐Segura, A. Pacheco‐Hernández, and S. Laporte‐Molina (2010), Lightning‐generated NOx seen by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument during NASA’s Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling Experiment (TC4), J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00J10, doi:10.1029/2009JD013118.

We present case studies identifying lightning‐generated upper tropospheric NOx (LNOx) observed during NASA’s Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling Experiment (TC4) in July and August 2007. In the campaign, DC‐8 aircraft missions, flown from Costa Rica, recorded in situ NO2 profiles near active storms and in relatively quiet areas. We combine these TC4 DC‐8 data with satellite data from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) to estimate the lightning‐generated NO2 (LNO2), above background levels, in the observed OMI NO2 fields. We employ improved off‐line processing techniques to customize the OMI retrieval for LNO2. Information on lightning flashes (primarily cloud‐to‐ground) observed by the Costa Rica Lightning Detection Network operated by the Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad and the World Wide Lightning Location Network were examined over storms upwind of regions where OMI indicates enhanced LNO2. These flash data are compared with Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission/Lightning Imaging Sensor satellite data to estimate total flashes. Finally, using [NOx]/[NO2] ratios from NASA’s Global Modeling Initiative model, we estimate LNOx production per flash for four cases and obtain rates of ∼100‐250 mol/flash. These are consistent with rates derived from previous studies of tropical and subtropical storms and below those from modeling of observed midlatitude storms. In our study, environments with stronger anvil‐level winds were associated with higher production rates. LIS flash footprint data for one of the low‐LNOx production cases with weak upper tropospheric winds suggest below‐average flash lengths for this storm. LNOx enhancements over background determined from the OMI data were in less than, but roughly proportional to, aircraft estimates.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.