Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US

Francoeur, C.B., B. McDonald, J.B. Gilman, . Zarzana, . Dix, S.S. Brown, . de Gouw, G.J. Frost, . Li, S.A. McKeen, J.W. Peischl, I.B. Pollack, T.B. Ryerson, C. Thompson, C. Warneke, and M.K. Trainer (2021), Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US, Environmental Science & Technology, 1-28, doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07352.
Abstract

We present an updated Fuel-based Oil and Gas Inventory (FOG) with estimates of nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from oil and natural gas production in the contiguous US (CONUS). We compare the FOG inventory with aircraft-derived (“top-down”) emissions for NOx over footprints that account for ~25% of US oil and natural gas production. Across CONUS, we find that the bottom-up FOG inventory combined with other anthropogenic emissions is on average within ~10% of top-down aircraft-derived NOx emissions. We also find good agreement in the trends of NOx from drilling- and production-phase activities, as inferred by satellites and in the bottom-up inventory. Leveraging tracer-tracer relationships derived from aircraft observations, methane (CH4) and non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions have been added to the inventory. Our total CONUS emission estimates for 2015 of oil and natural gas are 0.45 ± 0.14 Tg NOx/yr, 15.2 ± 3.0 Tg CH4/yr, and 5.7 ± 1.7 Tg NMVOC/yr. Compared to the US National Emissions Inventory (NEI 2014) and Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI), FOG NOx emissions are ~40% lower, while inferred CH4 and NMVOC emissions are up to a factor of ~2 higher. This suggests NMVOC/NOx emissions from oil and gas basins are ~3 times higher than current estimates, and will likely affect how air quality models represent ozone formation downwind of oil and gas fields.

PDF of Publication
Download from publisher's website
Research Program
Atmospheric Composition
Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program (ACMAP)
Funding Sources
This work was supported by NASA ROSES ACMAP (80NSSC19K0979) and NOAA (NA17OAR4320101).