[Exports_project_office] WG reports out to the Monday call??

[David Siegel]

Hi All,

Thanx for the feedback. Slightly revised schedule is going out with a reminder it will be flexible…  Thanx for the help.  

Meg and those interested, I really like the virtual poster session idea for ongoing student symposia.  Although am completely mystified in how to pull it off.  That said, I’m sure we’re not the only ones thinking about doing virtual poster sessions via zoom. Good leads of things that might work would be greatly appreciated…  

More shortly, 

Dave

> On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:42 PM, Meg Estapa <meg.estapa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The WG report out schedule is fine with me.
> 
> I think student symposia are a great idea.  Also, this might be a logistical hairball but could we do a "virtual poster session" with breakout rooms?  This Medium post on Zoom cocktail parties explains how (but I haven't tried it...)  https://medium.com/swlh/how-to-run-a-zoom-cocktail-party-and-have-better-classes-conferences-and-meetings-too-dc2c5b58f8be <https://medium.com/swlh/how-to-run-a-zoom-cocktail-party-and-have-better-classes-conferences-and-meetings-too-dc2c5b58f8be>
> 
> It might lead to better conversations for students.  Zoom is rough in plenary because you can't see your audience...  I would volunteer to help test-drive things.
> 
> Meg
> 
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:21 PM David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu <mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Hope you all are doing well and are staying safe. Still trying to figure out Monday zoom meetings going forward. Feedback that I have been given is that no WGs are ready to do 20 minute report outs this coming Monday, but some will be the following. Also I think we need some time to work thru our conundrums en masse.  The POC one this week was useful (and painful).  Other obvious ones are UVP & IFCB data issues, what to do about NPP/NCP and I’m sure there’s more.  So, a draft schedule going forward looks like...
> 
> July 6  WG 1 & 2
> July 13         WG 3 & 4
> July 20 WG 5 & POC 
> July 27         UVP & IFCB
> Aug 6   NPP & ??
> 
> Is this cool? Comments welcome.  Like to get a message out tomorrow, cancelling Monday and providing a schedule forward.  K?
> 
> We also received a request to start holding EXPORTS student symposia during these Monday time slots. Lots of reasons why this makes sense…  Maybe do AGU style talks - maybe 3 doing a time. What you all think?  We can splice these into the schedule above if there’s demand. Anyone want to help organize?? 
> 
> Best, Dave & Ivona
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:40 PM, David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu <mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I do not have volunteers at the moment for the Monday 11am/2pm results call. I’ve been bugging but folks are being resistant. Thanx if you have presented already (and no shame intended it you haven’t yet!!!).  Anyways, this coming Monday we’ll have a POC conversation led by Jason and Norm (ty!).  Sometime in the next month or so we’ll have the same with the UVP ship-ship  comparison (and I hope the IFCB too). 
> > 
> > Having sat in on most of the WGs lately it seems that we’re making a ton of progress and it seems it's time to let the entire team know.  Might be best to do 2 WG presentations at a time so things can get presented and questions answered.  So, first are we OK with this idea starting a week from this coming Monday (June 29)?  And if so who wants go first?  Or alternative ideas are welcome… 
> > 
> > Just trying to move the ball forward…  
> > 
> > Best, Dave
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/exports_project_office/attachments/20200627/fb7e2feb/attachment.html>