[Exports_project_office] WG reports out to the Monday call??

[Meg Estapa]

The WG report out schedule is fine with me.

I think student symposia are a great idea.  Also, this might be a
logistical hairball but could we do a "virtual poster session" with
breakout rooms?  This Medium post on Zoom cocktail parties explains how
(but I haven't tried it...)
https://medium.com/swlh/how-to-run-a-zoom-cocktail-party-and-have-better-classes-conferences-and-meetings-too-dc2c5b58f8be

It might lead to better conversations for students.  Zoom is rough in
plenary because you can't see your audience...  I would volunteer to help
test-drive things.

Meg

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:21 PM David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Hope you all are doing well and are staying safe. Still trying to figure
> out Monday zoom meetings going forward. Feedback that I have been given is
> that no WGs are ready to do 20 minute report outs this coming Monday, but
> some will be the following. Also I think we need some time to work thru our
> conundrums en masse.  The POC one this week was useful (and painful).
> Other obvious ones are UVP & IFCB data issues, what to do about NPP/NCP and
> I’m sure there’s more.  So, a draft schedule going forward looks like...
>
> July 6  WG 1 & 2
> July 13         WG 3 & 4
> July 20 WG 5 & POC
> July 27         UVP & IFCB
> Aug 6   NPP & ??
>
> Is this cool? Comments welcome.  Like to get a message out tomorrow,
> cancelling Monday and providing a schedule forward.  K?
>
> We also received a request to start holding EXPORTS student symposia
> during these Monday time slots. Lots of reasons why this makes sense…
> Maybe do AGU style talks - maybe 3 doing a time. What you all think?  We
> can splice these into the schedule above if there’s demand. Anyone want to
> help organize??
>
> Best, Dave & Ivona
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:40 PM, David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I do not have volunteers at the moment for the Monday 11am/2pm results
> call. I’ve been bugging but folks are being resistant. Thanx if you have
> presented already (and no shame intended it you haven’t yet!!!).  Anyways,
> this coming Monday we’ll have a POC conversation led by Jason and Norm
> (ty!).  Sometime in the next month or so we’ll have the same with the UVP
> ship-ship  comparison (and I hope the IFCB too).
> >
> > Having sat in on most of the WGs lately it seems that we’re making a ton
> of progress and it seems it's time to let the entire team know.  Might be
> best to do 2 WG presentations at a time so things can get presented and
> questions answered.  So, first are we OK with this idea starting a week
> from this coming Monday (June 29)?  And if so who wants go first?  Or
> alternative ideas are welcome…
> >
> > Just trying to move the ball forward…
> >
> > Best, Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/exports_project_office/attachments/20200626/46980967/attachment.html>