Lessons Learned from the Updated GEWEX Cloud Assessment Database Claudia J. Stubenrauch1 · Stefan Kinne2 · Giulio Mandorli1 · William B. Rossow3 · David M. Winker4 · Steven A. Ackerman5 · Helene Chepfer1 · Larry Di Girolamo6 · Anne Garnier4,7 · Andrew Hei

Stubenrauch, C., S. Kinne, G. Mandorli, W. Rossow, D. Winker, S.A. Ackerman, . Chepfer, L. Di Girolamo, A. Garnier, A.H.A.H. Andrew Heidinger, K.-G. Karlsson, K.G. Meyer, P. Minnis, S.E. Platnick, M. Stengel, S. Sun-Mack, P. Veglio, A. Walther, X. Cai, A.H. Young, and G. Zhao (2024), Lessons Learned from the Updated GEWEX Cloud Assessment Database Claudia J. Stubenrauch1 · Stefan Kinne2 · Giulio Mandorli1 · William B. Rossow3 · David M. Winker4 · Steven A. Ackerman5 · Helene Chepfer1 · Larry Di Girolamo6 · Anne Garnier4,7 · Andrew Hei, Surv. Geophys., doi:10.1007/s10712-024-09824-0.
Abstract

Since the first Global Energy and Water Exchanges cloud assessment a decade ago, existing cloud property retrievals have been revised and new retrievals have been developed. The new global long-term cloud datasets show, in general, similar results to those of the previous assessment. A notable exception is the reduced cloud amount provided by the CloudAerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) Science Team, resulting from an improved aerosol–cloud distinction. Height, opacity and thermodynamic phase determine the radiative effect of clouds. Their distributions as well as relative occurrences of cloud types distinguished by height and optical depth are discussed. The similar results of the two assessments indicate that further improvement, in particular on vertical cloud layering, can only be achieved by combining complementary information. We suggest such combination methods to estimate the amount of all clouds within the atmospheric column, including those hidden by clouds aloft. The results compare well with those from CloudSat-CALIPSO radar–lidar geometrical profiles as well as with results from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) corrected by the cloud vertical layer model, which is used for the computation of the ISCCP-derived radiative fluxes. Furthermore, we highlight studies on cloud monitoring using the information from the histograms of the database and give guidelines for: (1) the use of satellite-retrieved cloud properties in climate studies and climate model evaluation and (2) improved retrieval strategies.

PDF of Publication
Download from publisher's website

 

Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.