Chris Hostetler

Crosbie, E.C., et al. (2024), Measurement report: Cloud and environmental properties associated with aggregated shallow marine cumulus and cumulus congestus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-24-6123-2024.

Dmitrovic, S., et al. (2024), High Spectral Resolution Lidar – generation 2 (HSRL-2) retrievals of ocean surface wind speed: methodology and evaluation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3515-3532, doi:10.5194/amt-17-3515-2024.

Siu, L.W., et al. (2024), Summarizing multiple aspects of triple collocation analysis in a single diagram, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 5, 10.3389/frsen.2024.1395442, doi:10.3389/frsen.2024.1395442.

Siu, L.W., et al. (2024), Retrievals of aerosol optical depth over the western North Atlantic Ocean during ACTIVATE, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2739-2759, doi:10.5194/amt-17-2739-2024.

Xu, Y., et al. (2024), Boundary Layer Structures Over the Northwest Atlantic Derived From Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar and Dropsonde Measurements During the ACTIVATE Campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 129, e2023JD039878, doi:10.1029/2023JD039878.

Brunke, M.A., et al. (2023), Aircraft Observations of Turbulence in Cloudy and Cloud-Free Boundary Layers Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean From ACTIVATE and Implications for the Earth System Model Evaluation and Development, J. Geophys. Res..

Ferrare, R.A., et al. (2023), Airborne HSRL-2 measurements of elevated aerosol depolarization associated with non-spherical sea salt, TYPE Original Research, doi:10.3389/frsen.2023.1143944.

Sorooshian, A., et al. (2023), Spatially coordinated airborne data and complementary products for aerosol, gas, cloud, and meteorological studies: the NASA ACTIVATE dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3419-3472, doi:10.5194/essd-15-3419-2023.

Zhu, H., et al. (2023), Parameterization of size of organic and secondary inorganic aerosol for efficient representation of global aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-23-5023-2023.

Cochrane, S.P., et al. (2022), Biomass burning aerosol heating rates from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2016 and 2017 experiments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 61-77, doi:10.5194/amt-15-61-2022.

Fu, D., et al. (2022), An evaluation of the liquid cloud droplet effective radius derived from MODIS, airborne remote sensing, and in situ measurements from CAMP2 Ex, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-22-8259-2022.

Sanchez, K., et al. (2022), North Atlantic Ocean SST-gradient-driven variations in aerosol and cloud evolution along Lagrangian cold-air outbreak trajectories, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2795-2815, doi:10.5194/acp-22-2795-2022.

Schlosser, J.S., et al. (2022), Polarimeter + Lidar–Derived Aerosol Particle Number Concentration, Front. Remote Sens., 3, 885332, doi:10.3389/frsen.2022.885332.

Cochrane, S.P., et al. (2021), Biomass Burning Aerosol Heating Rates from the ORACLES, Atmos. Meas. Tech., and 2017 Experiments, doi:10.5194/acp-2021-169.

Mardi, A.H., et al. (2021), Biomass Burning Over the United States East Coast and Western North Atlantic Ocean: Implications for Clouds and Air Quality, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2021JD034916, doi:10.1029/2021JD034916.

Redemann, J., et al. (2021), An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1507-1563, doi:10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021.

Redemann, J., et al. (2020), An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the Southeast Atlantic basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., doi:10.5194/acp-2020-449.

Behrenfeld, M.J., et al. (2019), The North Atlantic Aerosol and Marine Ecosystem Study (NAAMES): Science Motive and Mission Overview, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 122, doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00122.

Cochrane, S.P., et al. (2019), Above-cloud aerosol radiative effects based on ORACLES 2016 and ORACLES 2017 aircraft experiments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6505-6528, doi:10.5194/amt-12-6505-2019.

Jamet, C., et al. (2019), Going Beyond Standard Ocean Color Observations: Lidar and Polarimetry, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 251, doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00251.

Sorooshian, A., et al. (2019), Aerosol–Cloud–Meteorology Interaction Airborne Field Investigations: Using Lessons Learned from the U.S. West Coast in the Design of ACTIVATE off the U.S. East Coast, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1511-1528, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0100.1.

Burton, S.P., et al. (2018), Calibration of a high spectral resolution lidar using a Michelson interferometer, with data examples from ORACLES, Appl. Opt., 57, 6061-6075, doi:10.1364/AO.57.006061.

Ottaviani, M., et al. (2018), Airborne and shipborne polarimetric measurements over open ocean and T coastal waters: Intercomparisons and implications for spaceborne observations ⁎, Remote Sensing of Environment, 206, 375-390, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.015.

Stamnes, S.A.M., et al. (2018), Simultaneous polarimeter retrievals of microphysical aerosol and ocean color parameters from the “MAPP” algorithm with comparison to high-spectral-resolution lidar aerosol and ocean products, Appl. Opt., 57, 2394-2413, doi:10.1364/AO.57.002394.

Xu, F., et al. (2018), Coupled Retrieval of Liquid Water Cloud and Above-Cloud Aerosol Properties Using the Airborne Multiangle SpectroPolarimetric Imager (AirMSPI), J. Geophys. Res., 123, 3175-3204, doi:10.1002/2017JD027926.

Dawson, K.W., et al. (2017), Creating Aerosol Types from CHemistry (CATCH): A New Algorithm to Extend the Link Between Remote Sensing and Models, J. Geophys. Res., 122, doi:10.1002/2017JD026913.

Sawamura, P., et al. (2017), c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. HSRL-2 aerosol optical measurements and microphysical retrievals vs. airborne in situ measurements during DISCOVER-AQ 2013: an intercomparison study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-2016-1164.

Berg, L.K., et al. (2016), (2016), The Two-Column Aerosol Project: Phase I—Overview and impact of elevated aerosol layers on aerosol optical depth, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 336-361, doi:10.1002/2015JD023848.

Burton, S.P., et al. (2016), Information content and sensitivity of the 3β+ 2α lidar measurement system for aerosol microphysical retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5555-5574, doi:10.5194/amt-9-5555-2016.

Luo, T., et al. (2015), Vertically resolved separation of dust and other aerosol types by a new lidar depolarization method, Optics Express, 23, 14095-14107, doi:10.1364/OE.23.014095.

Duncan, B., et al. (2014), Satellite data of atmospheric pollution for U.S. air quality applications: Examples of applications, summary of data end-user resources, answers to FAQs, and common mistakes to avoid, Atmos. Environ., 94, 647-662, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.061.

Eck, T.F., et al. (2014), Observations of rapid aerosol optical depth enhancements in the vicinity of polluted cumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11633-11656, doi:10.5194/acp-14-11633-2014.

Kacenelenbogen, M.S., et al. (2014), An evaluation of CALIOP/CALIPSO’s aerosol-above-cloud (AAC) detection and retrieval capability. , J. Geophys. Res., 119, 230-244.

Sawamura, P., et al. (2014), Aerosol optical and microphysical retrievals from a hybrid multiwavelength lidar data set – DISCOVER-AQ 2011, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3095-3112, doi:10.5194/amt-7-3095-2014.

Munchak, ., et al. (2013), MODIS 3 km aerosol product: applications over land in an urban/suburban region, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1747-1759, doi:10.5194/amt-6-1747-2013.

Patadia, F., et al. (2013), Aerosol airmass type mapping over the Urban Mexico City region from space-based multi-angle imaging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9525-9541, doi:10.5194/acp-13-9525-2013.

Ryerson, T.B., et al. (2013), The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5830-5866, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50331.

Shinozuka, Y., et al. (2013), Hyperspectral aerosol optical depths from TCAP flights, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 12,180-12,194, doi:10.1002/2013JD020596.

Zhai, P., et al. (2013), Uncertainty and interpretation of aerosol remote sensing due to vertical inhomogeneity, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 114, 91-100, doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.08.006.

Ziemba, L.D., et al. (2013), Airborne observations of aerosol extinction by in situ and remote-sensing techniques: Evaluation of particle hygroscopicity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 417-422, doi:10.1029/2012GL054428.

Burton, S.P., et al. (2012), Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 73-98, doi:10.5194/amt-5-73-2012.

Leahy, L., et al. (2012), On the nature and extent of optically thin marine low clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22201, doi:10.1029/2012JD017929.

LeBlanc, S., et al. (2012), Spectral aerosol direct radiative forcing from airborne radiative measurements during CalNex and ARCTAS, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V20, doi:10.1029/2012JD018106.

Ottaviani, M., et al. (2012), Polarimetric retrievals of surface and cirrus clouds properties in the region affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Remote Sensing of Environment, 121, 389-403, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.016.

Zaveri, R.A., et al. (2012), Overview of the 2010 Carbonaceous Aerosols and Radiative Effects Study (CARES), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7647-7687, doi:10.5194/acp-12-7647-2012.

Kacenelenbogen, M.S., et al. (2011), An accuracy assessment of the CALIOP/CALIPSO version 2/version 3 daytime aerosol extinction product based on a detailed multi-sensor, multi-platform case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3981-4000, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3981-2011.

Knobelspiesse, K.D., et al. (2011), Combined retrievals of boreal forest fire aerosol properties with a polarimeter and lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7045-7067, doi:10.5194/acp-11-7045-2011.

Jacob, D.J., et al. (2010), The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5191-5212, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5191-2010.

Kassianov, E., et al. (2010), Retrieval of aerosol optical depth in vicinity of broken clouds from reflectance ratios: case study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1333-1349, doi:10.5194/amt-3-1333-2010.

Rogers, R.R., et al. (2009), NASA LaRC airborne high spectral resolution lidar aerosol measurements during MILAGRO: observations and validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4811-4826, doi:10.5194/acp-9-4811-2009.

Hair, J., et al. (2008), Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar for Profiling Aerosol Optical Properties, Appl. Opt., 47, doi:10.1364/AO.47.006734.

Hu, Y., et al. (2008), Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3593-3601, doi:10.5194/acp-8-3593-2008.

Liu, ., et al. (2008), Airborne dust distributions over the Tibetan Plateau and surrounding areas derived from the first year of CALIPSO lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5045-5060, doi:10.5194/acp-8-5045-2008.

Diner, D.J., et al. (2004), Understanding Aerosols Paragon: An Integrated Approach for Characterizing Aerosol Climate Impacts and Environmental Interactions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1491, doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-10-1491.