Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.

 

An analysis of fast photochemistry over high northern latitudes during spring...

Olson, J., J. Crawford, W. H. Brune, J. Mao, X. Ren, A. Fried, B. E. Anderson, E. Apel, M. Beaver, D. R. Blake, G. Chen, J. D. Crounse, J. Dibb, G. S. Diskin, S. R. Hall, L. G. Huey, D. Knapp, D. Richter, D. Riemer, J. M. St. Clair, K. Ullmann, J. G. Walega, P. Weibring, A. Weinheimer, P. Wennberg, and A. Wisthaler (2012), An analysis of fast photochemistry over high northern latitudes during spring and summer using in-situ observations from ARCTAS and TOPSE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6799-6825, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6799-2012.
Abstract: 

Observations of chemical constituents and meteorological quantities obtained during the two Arctic phases of the airborne campaign ARCTAS (Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites) are analyzed using an observationally constrained steady state box model. Measurements of OH and HO2 from the Penn State ATHOS instrument are compared to model predictions. Forty percent of OH measurements below 2 km are at the limit of detection during the spring phase (ARCTASA). While the median observed-to-calculated ratio is near one, both the scatter of observations and the model uncertainty for OH are at the magnitude of ambient values. During the summer phase (ARCTAS-B), model predictions of OH are biased low relative to observations and demonstrate a high sensitivity to the level of uncertainty in NO observations. Predictions of HO2 using observed CH2 O and H2 O2 as model constraints are up to a factor of two larger than observed. A temperature-dependent terminal loss rate of HO2 to aerosol recently proposed in the literature is shown to be insufficient to reconcile these differences. A comparison of ARCTAS-A to the high latitude springtime portion of the 2000 TOPSE campaign (Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox) shows similar meteorological and chemical environments with the exception of peroxides; observations of H2 O2 during ARCTAS-A were 2.5 to 3 times larger than those during TOPSE. The cause of this difference in peroxides remains unresolved and has important implications for the Arctic HOx budget. Unconstrained model predictions for both phases indicate photochemistry alone is unable to simultaneously sustain observed levels of CH2 O and H2 O2 ; however when the model is constrained with observed CH2 O, H2 O2 predictions from a range of

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.