Primary tabs

 

Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.

 

2 fluxes obtained by combining surface-based and 3 space-based atmospheric CO2...

Byrne, B., J. Liu, M. Lee, I. Baker, K. Bowman, N. Deutscher, D. G. Feist, D. Griffith, L. Iraci, M. Kiel, J. S. Kimball, C. E. Miller, I. Morino, N. Parazoo, C. Petri, C. Roehl, M. K. Sha, K. Strong, V. Velazco, P. Wennberg, and D. Wunch (2020), 2 fluxes obtained by combining surface-based and 3 space-based atmospheric CO2 measurements, J. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2019JD032029.
Abstract: 

Top‐down estimates of CO2 fluxes are typically constrained by either surface‐based or space‐based CO2 observations. Both of these measurement types have spatial and temporal gaps in observational coverage that can lead to differences in inferred fluxes. Assimilating both surface‐based and space‐based measurements concurrently in a flux inversion framework improves observational coverage and reduces sampling related artifacts. This study examines the consistency of flux constraints provided by these different observations and the potential to combine them by performing a series of six‐year (2010‐‐2015) CO2 flux inversions. Flux inversions are performed assimilating surface‐based measurements from the in situ and flask network, measurements from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON), and space‐based measurements from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), or all three datasets combined. Combining the datasets results in more precise flux estimates for sub‐continental regions relative to any of the datasets alone. Combining the datasets also improves the accuracy of the posterior fluxes, based on reduced root‐mean‐square differences between posterior‐flux‐simulated CO2 and aircraft‐based CO2 over midlatitude regions (0.33‐‐0.56 ppm) in comparison to GOSAT (0.37‐‐0.61 ppm), TCCON (0.50‐‐0.68 ppm), or in situ and flask measurements (0.46‐‐0.56 ppm) alone. These results suggest that surface‐based and GOSAT measurements give complementary constraints on CO2 fluxes in the northern extratropics and can be combined in flux inversions to improve constraints on regional fluxes. This stands in contrast with many earlier attempts to combine these datasets and suggests that improvements in the NASA Atmospheric CO2 Observations from Space (ACOS) retrieval algorithm have significantly improved the consistency of space‐based and surface‐based flux constraints.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.
Research Program: 
Atmospheric Composition
Carbon Cycle & Ecosystems Program (CCEP)