Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.
The sudden onset of ozone depletion in the Antarctic vortex set a precedent for both the time scale and the severity of global change. The AIRBORNE ANTARCTIC OZONE EXPERIMENT (AAOE) staged from Punta Arenas, Chile, in 1987, established that CFCs and Halons are the source of chlorine and bromine radicals that, in turn, control the rate of ozone destruction, that the vortex is depleted in nitrogen oxides, reactive nitrogen, and water vapor and that diabatic cooling during the antarctic winter leads to subsidence within the vortex core importing air from higher altitudes and lower latitudes. This last conclusion is based on observed dramatic distortion in the tracer fields, most notably N2O.
In 1989 the AIRBORNE ARCTIC STRATOSPHERIC EXPEDITION (AASE) staged from Stavanger, Norway, using the same aircraft employed for AAOE, the NASA ER-2 and the NASA DC-8, discovered that while NOx and to some degree NOy were perturbed within the arctic vortex, there was little evidence for desiccation. Under these (in contrast, to the antarctic) marginally perturbed conditions, however, ClO was found to be dramatically perturbed such that a large fraction of the available (inorganic) chlorine resided in free radical and free radical dimer form.
This leaves two abiding issues for the northern hemisphere:
1. WILL SIGNIFICANT OZONE EROSION OCCUR WITHIN THE ARCTIC VORTEX IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS AS CHLORINE LOADING IN THE STRATOSPHERE APPROACHES 5 ppbv? THAT IS, WILL AN "OZONE HOLE" APPEAR IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE BY DECADE'S END?
2. WHICH MECHANISMS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OBSERVED OZONE EROSION POLEWARD OF 30 DEGREES N IN THE WINTER/SPRING NORTHERN HEMISPHERE REPORTED IN SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS?
While there are literally dozens of specific questions that must be dealt with quantitatively in the course of answering the above questions, for the sake of coherence they can be categorized as follows:
Question 1: How do the meteorological (pressure, temperature, wind) fields, radiation (UV, VIS, IR) fields, tracer (N20. CH4, CFC-11) fields, ozone, and water vapor fields evolve during set up, maintenance, and break up of the vortex?
The thrust of this question is to define for the first time the structure of the stratosphere poleward of 40 latitude to as high an altitude as possible.
Question 2. What are the threshold conditions for significant repartitioning of reactive species within the nitrogen, chlorine, bromine, and hydrogen families?
The thrust of this question is to understand how the reactive compounds, most notably the catalytically active free radicals, respond to the dropping temperatures that initiate polar stratospheric cloud formation both inside and within the environs of the vortex.
Question 3. How do ozone loss rates resulting from free radical catalytic processes evolve with time as a function of altitude, latitude, and solar zenith angle? How much ozone is destroyed by chemical processes within the vortex?
This question raises both (a) intravortex loss, which has been crudely quantified in a limited region within the antarctic vortex, as well as (b) more broadly distributed ozone erosion in the northern hemisphere well outside the arctic vortex. How will this situation evolve as chlorine loading approaches 5 ppbv?