[Meeting-support] Our TEMPO STM Validation session is 2 June at 1345-1445 EDT. Send your 1 or 2 slides by this Friday, please.

[Tom Moore]

Hi, Mike and all – I won’t have any slides to contribute for this session on June 2nd, but hope to attend the majority of the overall meeting. Thanks for including me.  I like the slides that John sent.  Hope all have a good Memorial Day weekend.


Best wishes, Tom

Tom Moore
Western States Air Resources Council (WESTAR)
WRAP Air Quality Program Manager (www.wrapair2.org<http://www.wrapair2.org>)
e: tmoore at westar.org<mailto:tmoore at westar.org> | m: 970.988.4055

From: Mike Newchurch <mike.newchurch at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:48 PM
To: Jim Szykman <james.j.szykman at nasa.gov>; Tom Moore <tmoore at westar.org>; John T. Sullivan <john.t.sullivan at nasa.gov>; Kotsakis, Alexander E. (GSFC-614.0)[UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION] <alexander.e.kotsakis at nasa.gov>; Lefer, Barry L. <barry.lefer at nasa.gov>; Judd, Laura M. (LARC-E303)[UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION] <laura.m.judd at nasa.gov>; Valin, Lukas <Valin.Lukas at epa.gov>
Cc: Ronald C COHEN <rccohen at berkeley.edu>; tempo at espo.nasa.gov; meeting-support at espo.nasa.gov; Hanisco, Thomas Frost. (GSFC-6140) <thomas.hanisco at nasa.gov>; Aaron Naeger <aaron.naeger at nasa.gov>; Xiong Liu <xliu at cfa.harvard.edu>; rsuleiman at cfa.harvard.edu; Mike Newchurch <mike.newchurch at gmail.com>
Subject: Our TEMPO STM Validation session is 2 June at 1345-1445 EDT. Send your 1 or 2 slides by this Friday, please.

Jim/Luke, Tom, John, Alex, Laura, and Barry:

The format for our session is for Ron to present (5 minutes) the new scientific aspects and metrics of validating a GEO space-borne AQ sensor, for me to present 1 slide on a suggested process to create the validation plan, and then for each of you to present 1 or 2 slides summarizing, in 5 minutes each, the significant aspects of your organization's planned activities and concerns related to TEMPO validation. Barry will summarize campaign activities related to TEMPO. We will then have 30 minutes to discuss all of these plans and concerns. We want to emphasize the discussion portion and want to hear your thoughts and ideas about what everyone is thinking.

Two desired outcomes are:
1. Determine which 3 Pandora sites will constitute the 'contractual validation effort" and on what schedule. This discussion should be quite short.
2. Establish a process (monthly telecons?) to establish concrete plans for discrete observations and anticipated schedules for all correlated observations and how those observations will contribute to understanding TEMPO performance with validation metrics. This discussion will be the beginning of a year-long planning process.

Several of you have contributed ideas and questions about the validation plan. And, there are many more parties interested in being involved with the validation efforts than we can accomodate in this session. These additional parties include some of the Early Adopters and some of the Green Paper investigators. Feel free to represent any other folks who you know have an interest and we will broaden the spectrum in the subsequent planning telecons. This session is our opportunity to synthesize a coordinated approach to planning this effort.

It would be helpful if you could send your 1 or 2 slides to me by May 28 (this friday, long weekend), in preparation for the TEMPO meeting next Wednesday (you'll get an invitation to the meeting).

Meeting info site:
https://meeting-info.org/tempo-stm2021/

Thanks,
Mike and Ron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/meeting-support/attachments/20210528/ad5429cc/attachment.htm>