[Exports_project_office] Fwd: where to deploy?

[ivona.cetinic]

Hello to all,
Please see attached. There is a discussion about deployment of float. Ivona

Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S8.
-------- Original message --------From: Eric D'Asaro <dasaro at apl.washington.edu> Date: 7/31/18  7:32 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Ivona Cetinic <ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov> Subject: Fwd: where to deploy? 


Begin forwarded message:
From: Mary Jane Perry <perrymj at maine.edu>
Subject: Re: where to deploy?
Date: July 31, 2018 at 4:31:02 PM PDT
To: "Eric D'Asaro" <dasaro at apl.washington.edu>
Cc: "Craig M. Lee" <craig at apl.washington.edu>

Eric, Can you tell this to Project Office. Debbie will need to know where to go. (Craig , I missed PO call last week, so if this is already decided, ignore me.)
  Norm and I need to revisit the sampling plan. I am suggesting we deploy the LF on Day 1 and calibrate it on Day 2.  Ideally, if we could calibrate the glider on Day 1, that would be ideal from the standpoint of spacing Winkler analysis for Weiyi.

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Eric D'Asaro <dasaro at apl.washington.edu> wrote:
It doesn’t make much difference, scientifically.  The issues are mostly practical and logistical, such as:
1. Near PAPA not in any of the OOI exclusion zone
2. Probably a bit away from PAPA so that the ships don’t have to worry about towing or deploying stuff near the moorings.  This should be determined from AVISO data
For example, from today’s image, the arrowhead is about 40 km NE of P.  Somewhere along the line between this and P would be good, as the flow will likely carry the float away from P and not back to P again for a month, and also not go very fast.  Thermal gradients are weak in this region (at least in microwave), so there’s probably not much variability.


On Jul 31, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Mary Jane Perry <perrymj at maine.edu> wrote:
Eric, I actually do need to know what you are thinking? Or is this a Project Office discussion?  thanks, Mary Jane

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Mary Jane Perry <perrymj at maine.edu> wrote:
Well, now that we don't have to model when the float will arrive at St. P, where do we want to deploy?

-- 
Mary Jane Perry                                                         Emerita Professor, School of Marine Sciences
University of Maine, Orono ME 
Mailing address: 502  Twisp-Carlton Road, Twisp WA 98856
new cell phone:   509-449-8922perrymj at maine.edu






-- 
Mary Jane Perry                                                         Emerita Professor, School of Marine Sciences
University of Maine, Orono ME 
Mailing address: 502  Twisp-Carlton Road, Twisp WA 98856
new cell phone:   509-449-8922perrymj at maine.edu





Eric A. D'AsaroApplied Physics Laboratory andSchool of OceanographyUniversity of Washington1013 NE 40th StrBox 355640
Seattle, WA 98105-6698dasaro AT apl.washington.edu





-- 
Mary Jane Perry                                                         Emerita Professor, School of Marine Sciences
University of Maine, Orono ME 
Mailing address: 502  Twisp-Carlton Road, Twisp WA 98856
new cell phone:   509-449-8922perrymj at maine.edu





Eric A. D'AsaroApplied Physics Laboratory andSchool of OceanographyUniversity of Washington1013 NE 40th StrBox 355640
Seattle, WA 98105-6698dasaro AT apl.washington.edu


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/exports_project_office/attachments/20180731/be46da26/attachment-0001.html>