[Exports_pi] Reminder: Line P meeting feedback and telecom this tuesday...

Tue Mar 27 09:09:03 PDT 2018

Hello to all

presentation is here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nZnmZUgqsQZrGIOz-EK7d5lPubQp6qZY2LA1vFjEoiohttps://drive.google.com/open?id=1nZnmZUgqsQZrGIOz-EK7d5lPubQp6qZY2LA1vFjEoio

Ivona

Ivona Cetinic, Ph.D.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/USRA
Ocean Ecology Laboratory
Code 616
Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Phone: +1-301-286-1514

"You can observe a lot just by watchin'." Yogi Berra
________________________________
From: Exports_pi [exports_pi-bounces at espo.nasa.gov] on behalf of ivona.cetinic [ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 11:57 AM
To: David Siegel; Exports_pi at espo.nasa.gov
Cc: Robert, Marie; Ross, Tetjana
Subject: Re: [Exports_pi] Reminder: Line P meeting feedback and telecom this tuesday...

Hi to all,

International phone numbers are

https://docs.google.com/document/d/189w5A7gDI2XBUDLwOPeZgU328hQVeUVmdhyTQBUfhng/edit?usp=drivesdk

Ivona

Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S8+.

-------- Original message --------
From: David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu>
Date: 3/26/18 8:20 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Exports_pi at espo.nasa.gov
Cc: "Ross, Tetjana" <tetjana.ross at dfo-mpo.gc.ca>, "Robert, Marie" <Marie.Robert at dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
Subject: [Exports_pi] Reminder: Line P meeting feedback and telecom this tuesday...

Reminder. Telecom tomorrow. Same time/place…  Dave

On Mar 25, 2018, at 6:26 PM, David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu<mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>> wrote:

Hi All,

This Tuesday we will discuss our collaborating with the Line P project in our first EXPORTS field deployment. Tues March 27 9PT noonET.
     EXPORTS Telecom Numbers
       USA Toll Free # 1 844 467 4685
       USA Local/Toll # + 720 259 7012
       Participant Passcode:  804464
       Contact Ivona (ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov<mailto:ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov>) if you need a non-US dial in #

The Line P meeting went super well and they all seem very excited to be working with us. The plan of the moment is for the Line P cruise on the Tully to be at Station P about 10 days after we leave it and they have two days of ship time to optimize sampling to interact with us. Details of the possible collaborations (from 35K feet) are in the reporting out from the meeting below. Thanx to Craig Lee for coming along. I am very excited about the possibilities here.

Key thing for us to discuss on Tuesday is matching up PIs to PIs.  On the google drive I added a folder for the Line P meeting (see https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pPF55d-JLVfmGLz9Gums2Dq2jDQ98frq). In there is the talk that Tetjana Ross presented at our PI meeting, the talk I gave at the Line P meeting and a mashup document listing which EXPORTS PIs link to which Line P PIs (mashup doc is attached here).  We will go thru that and talk about possibilities. If this is to work we need to make contact with Line P PIs. I know many of you have started this already. Do not be surprised if Roberta or I initiate these interactions.

Talk with you all then.  Best, Dave

<LineP_EXPORTS_PI_Mashup_Mar_12_2018.pptx>

Begin forwarded message:

From: David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu<mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>>
Subject: Thoughts on moving forward with a Line P / EXPORTS collaboration...
Date: March 21, 2018 at 5:43:38 PM PDT
To: Roberta Hamme <rhamme at uvic.ca<mailto:rhamme at uvic.ca>>
Cc: "Craig M. Lee" <craig at apl.washington.edu<mailto:craig at apl.washington.edu>>, David Siegel <david.siegel at ucsb.edu<mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>>, Ivona Cetinic <ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov<mailto:ivona.cetinic at nasa.gov>>, Paula Bontempi <paula.bontempi at nasa.gov<mailto:paula.bontempi at nasa.gov>>, Laura Lorenzoni <laura.lorenzoni at nasa.gov<mailto:laura.lorenzoni at nasa.gov>>

Hi Roberta,

Thanx for a great meeting and the chance to think about what we can to do together. At the highest level, we’d love to include as many Line P participants as would be interested in EXPORTS. There are obvious win-win’s there for both programs - international goodwill, visibility with our agencies, high impact shared pubs, expanding science opportunities, etc. Craig and I sat down this morning and made some rough plans going forward. I’ve iterated some and would love your input.

First, high-level priorities from the EXPORTS point of view are probably in order: 1) provide an additional state assessment that contributes to EXPORTS at the float location (following the 2 day 5 station plan you layed out), 2) intercalibrate the subsurface float and glider sensors with Line P data, 3) expand the EXPORTS intensive sampling phase temporal baseline, and 4) intercalibrate the BGC-ARGO floats.  One challenge will be to think about how to deploy the subsurface float so its somewhere near Station P when you guys are out there.  The other issues, communicating locations, timing gliders, finding the BGC-ARGO floats are more straight forward.

Second, as you know, the collaborations are best if they are PI to PI. There is a lot of that going on already.  Next Tuesday we will talk through possibilities with our PI team (hope you can join us!!).  I’ll send out the PI mashup this weekend and hopefully will get folks to look at it ahead of time. Know I am very interested in including your PIs into EXPORTS as much as they can stand. We can’t help with our $s (beyond things individual PIs what to do). This might mean participating in the data meeting we need to hold (early spring next year?).

Third, data consistency will be critical. Bunch of things will need to happen. We will need to get the Line P folks into the parameter working group activities (measurement protocol / metadata construction) that are going on shortly. There are many instances where we can share duplicate samples across labs to collect inter calibrated data. We can also collect samples for Line P folks on EXPORTS (given obvious constraints). There is a procedure we have in place to do that (but it requires making a connection with a PI in the program).  We can roll this out once we plans are made by paired PIs.

Last, we will need to think logistics. Not right this second - as we can easily piggy back off the situational awareness plans we need to work out for us to do EXPORTS independent of Line P.  This will require some of your folks to get involved in all of this (including maybe participating in the project office as the chief scientists do). My guess is that we’ll need to get this going in earnest in May.  Marie told me that the CS on the Tully will have email all the time, so we’re not concerned about helping to locate the sampling.

Thanx again for sticking this out and believing that a notional pie in the sky plan might be something more than just notional... Just trying to lay out the issues as I understand them. Please comment on the above (best end of the day on Friday) so we can iterate with the Project Office before we interact with the entire PI list.

Best, Dave

PS - Please feel free to share this with Marie if you think that makes sense to you. Not sure if its ready for that (or not).

************************
David A. Siegel
Chair, Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Marine Science, and
Professor, Department of Geography and Earth Research Institute
UC Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3060, USA
Ph: 01-805-893-4547
Em: david.siegel at ucsb.edu<mailto:david.siegel at ucsb.edu>
URL: people.eri.ucsb.edu/~davey<http://people.eri.ucsb.edu/~davey>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/exports_pi/attachments/20180327/0e191a64/attachment-0001.html>