[All] Mission Participants question

[Zavaleta, Jhony R. (ARC-SGG)]

I’d say create group of instruments (I.e. the X, Y, Z instruments) for those instruments with a single group of people. You could always separate the instruments on the dedicated instrument page (which doesn’t have an impact on the reports).




Jhony



JHONY R. ZAVALETA
Project Manager - NASA Earth Science Project Office

MS 232-22, Bldg. N232, Room N232-242
NASA Ames Research Center
Moffett Field CA 94035

Cellphone:  +1 (650) 224-4825 (worldwide)

Office: +1 (650) 604-0125

________________________________
From: Cs_espo_all <cs_espo_all-bounces at espo.nasa.gov> on behalf of Chirica, Dan C. (ARC-SGG) via All via Cs_espo_all <cs_espo_all at espo.nasa.gov>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 9:30:06 AM
To: all at espo.nasa.gov <all at espo.nasa.gov>
Cc: Chirica, Dan C. (ARC-SGG) via All <all at espo.nasa.gov>
Subject: [CS] [All] Mission Participants question

This is mostly a topic for the ESPO web dev, however, I think there might be other interested in this topic hence the All email.

The Participants page on our mission websites assumes one group/instrument, correct? If that's the case, what is the best way to deal with projects that have groups with multiple instruments (DCOTSS has two groups with more than one instrument)?

1) Create a group/instrument (+ simplifies the reports, no duplicate names, - does not allow for adding a link to the instrument database)

2) Create multiple groups (- reports will have duplicate names, + can add links to the instrument database, + associate instruments with projects, and aircraft missions)

Any thoughts?

--Dan Chirica
Project Manager - Earth Science Project Office
NASA Ames Research Center
dan.c at nasa.gov
+1 (650) 604-0436
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://espo.nasa.gov/pipermail/all/attachments/20210604/b2a394f4/attachment-0001.htm>