Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns

Norman, O.G., C.L. Heald, S. Bililign, P. Campuzano Jost, H. Coe, M.N. Fiddler, J.R. Green, J.L. Jimenez, K. Kaiser, J. Liao, A.M. Middlebrook, B.A. Nault, J.B. Nowak, J. Schneider, and A. Welti (2025), Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., doi:10.5194/acp-25-771-2025.
Abstract

Secondary inorganic aerosols (sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium, SNA) are major contributors to fine particulate matter. Predicting concentrations of these species is complicated by the cascade of processes that control their abundance, including emissions, chemistry, thermodynamic partitioning, and removal. In this study, we use 11 flight campaigns to evaluate the GEOS-Chem model performance for SNA. Across all the campaigns, the model performance is best for sulfate (R 2 = 0.51; normalized mean bias (NMB) = 0.11) and worst for nitrate (R 2 = 0.22; NMB = 1.76), indicating substantive model deficiencies in the nitrate simulation. Thermodynamic partitioning reproduces the total particulate nitrate well (R 2 = 0.79; NMB = 0.09), but actual partitioning (i.e., ε(NO− − 3 ) = NO3 / TNO3 ) is challenging to assess given the limited sets of full gas- and particle-phase observations needed for ISORROPIA II. In particular, ammonia observations are not often included in aircraft cam-

PDF of Publication
Download from publisher's website
Research Program
Tropospheric Composition Program (TCP)
Mission
MILAGRO
DC3
KORUS-AQ
FIREX-AQ
WINTER