The AVE-Houston2 website will be undergoing a major upgrade beginning Friday, October 11th at 5:00 PM PDT. The new upgraded site will be available no later than Monday, October 21st. Please plan to complete any critical activities before or after this time.

 

Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.

 

Comparison of optimal estimation HDO/H2O retrievals from AIRS with ORACLES...

Herman, R. L., J. Worden, D. Noone, D. Henze, K. Bowman, K. Cady-Pereira, V. Payne, S. Kulawik, and D. Fu (2020), Comparison of optimal estimation HDO/H2O retrievals from AIRS with ORACLES measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1825-1834, doi:10.5194/amt-13-1825-2020.
Abstract: 

In this paper we evaluate new retrievals of the deuterium content of water vapor from the Aqua Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS), with aircraft measurements of HDO and H2 O from the ObseRvations of Aerosols above Clouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) field mission. Single-footprint AIRS radiances are processed with an optimal estimation algorithm that provides vertical profiles of the HDO/H2 O ratio, characterized uncertainties and instrument operators (i.e., averaging kernel matrix). These retrievals are compared to vertical profiles of the HDO/H2 O ratio from the Oregon State University Water Isotope Spectrometer for Precipitation and Entrainment Research (WISPER) on the ORACLES NASA P-3B Orion aircraft. Measurements were taken over the southeastern Atlantic Ocean from 31 August to 25 September 2016. HDO/H2 O is commonly reported in D notation, which is the fractional deviation of the HDO/H2 O ratio from the standard reference ratio. For collocated measurements, the satellite instrument operator (averaging kernels and a priori constraint) is applied to the aircraft profile measurements. We find that AIRS D bias relative to the aircraft is well within the estimated measurement uncertainty. In the lower troposphere, 1000 to 800 hPa, AIRS D bias is

6.6 ‰ and the root-mean-square (rms) deviation is 20.9 ‰, consistent with the calculated uncertainty of 19.1 ‰. In the mid-troposphere, 800 to 500 hPa, AIRS D bias is 6.8 ‰ and rms 44.9 ‰, comparable to the calculated uncertainty of 25.8 ‰.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.
Research Program: 
Terrestrial Hydrology Program (THP)
Atmospheric Composition
Tropospheric Composition Program (TCP)
Energy & Water Cycle Program (EWCP)