Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers. Visit https://espo.nasa.gov for information about our current projects.

 

The Double‐ITCZ Bias in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 Models Based on Annual Mean...

Tian, B., and X. Dong (2020), The Double‐ITCZ Bias in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 Models Based on Annual Mean Precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087232, doi:10.1029/2020GL087232.
Abstract: 

The double‐intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) bias is one of the most outstanding errors in all previous generations of climate models. Here, the annual double‐ITCZ bias and the associated precipitation bias in the latest climate models for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 6 (CMIP6) are examined in comparison to their previous generations (CMIP Phase 3 [CMIP3] and CMIP Phase 5 [CMIP5]). All three generations of CMIP models share similar systematic annual multi‐model ensemble mean precipitation errors in the tropics. The notorious double‐ITCZ bias and its big inter‐model spread persist in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 models. Based on several tropical precipitation bias indices, the double‐ITCZ bias is slightly reduced from CMIP3 or CMIP5 to CMIP6. In addition, the annual equatorial Pacific cold tongue persists in all three generations of CMIP models, but its inter‐model spread is reduced from CMIP3 to CMIP5 and from CMIP5 to CMIP6. Plain Language Summary The double‐intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) bias is one of the most outstanding errors in all previous generations of climate models that may reduce the reliability of future climate prediction based on these models. The models have two ITCZs (i.e., zonally elongated narrow belt of high precipitation) in both hemispheres, over the equatorial central and eastern Pacific and Atlantic, instead of one ITCZ over the northern hemisphere in observations except for a short period in March and April. Here, we examine such bias in the latest models for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 6 (CMIP6) based on long‐term annual mean precipitations in observations and models and compare the biases among the recent three generations of CMIP models (CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6). We find that the double‐ITCZ bias with a big inter‐model spread persists in all CMIP models and still remains a serious problem in the latest CMIP6 models. However, the bias is slightly reduced in CMIP6 models from CMIP3 or CMIP5 models based on several precipitation bias indices. In addition, the annual equatorial Pacific cold tongue bias also persists in all CMIP models, but its inter‐model spread is reduced from CMIP3 to CMIP5 and from CMIP5 to CMIP6.

PDF of Publication: 
Download from publisher's website.
Research Program: 
Modeling Analysis and Prediction Program (MAP)
Energy & Water Cycle Program (EWCP)
Climate Variability and Change Program
Atmospheric Dynamics and Precipitation Program (ADP)
Mission: 
Global Precipitation Measurement
TRMM
Funding Sources: 
NASA TASNPP